"Traditional academic science describes human beings as highly developed animals and biological thinking machines. We appear to be Newtonian objects made of atoms, molecules, cells, tissues, and organs"
About this Quote
Stanislav Grof challenges the comfort of a purely mechanistic view of human beings. The language of Newtonian objects and biological thinking machines evokes a paradigm that dissects us into parts and laws: atoms into molecules, cells into tissues, organs into systems. That framework has been astonishingly powerful for medicine and neuroscience, delivering precision, prediction, and control. Yet it also flattens interiority into circuitry, treating consciousness as an incidental by-product rather than a fundamental feature of human life. The word appear is doing important work: under the lenses and instruments of traditional science, we look like machines, but perhaps only because those methods are designed to see machinery.
Grof speaks from a career spent investigating nonordinary states of consciousness, from early LSD-assisted psychotherapy to holotropic breathwork and the development of transpersonal psychology. The extraordinary phenomenology he documented — perinatal relivings, archetypal themes, experiences of expanded identity — convinced him that the mind is not exhaustively explained by brain mechanics. He casts the Newtonian-Cartesian picture as historically bounded and incomplete, and looks instead to holistic and systems perspectives, and to hints from modern physics that reality is more relational and less clocklike than the old paradigm assumed.
The critique is not an anti-scientific dismissal but a call to widen the scope of inquiry. A science that confines itself to third-person measurements while discounting first-person experience risks missing the qualities that matter most: meaning, value, purpose, and the transformative potential of consciousness. Grof argues for an expanded cartography of the psyche and for methods that can rigorously engage subjective data. Whether one agrees with his conclusions or not, the provocation remains fruitful. If we study only what our tools can measure, we may confuse the map for the territory. If we refine our tools to include experience itself, a richer, more humane science of the person might emerge.
Grof speaks from a career spent investigating nonordinary states of consciousness, from early LSD-assisted psychotherapy to holotropic breathwork and the development of transpersonal psychology. The extraordinary phenomenology he documented — perinatal relivings, archetypal themes, experiences of expanded identity — convinced him that the mind is not exhaustively explained by brain mechanics. He casts the Newtonian-Cartesian picture as historically bounded and incomplete, and looks instead to holistic and systems perspectives, and to hints from modern physics that reality is more relational and less clocklike than the old paradigm assumed.
The critique is not an anti-scientific dismissal but a call to widen the scope of inquiry. A science that confines itself to third-person measurements while discounting first-person experience risks missing the qualities that matter most: meaning, value, purpose, and the transformative potential of consciousness. Grof argues for an expanded cartography of the psyche and for methods that can rigorously engage subjective data. Whether one agrees with his conclusions or not, the provocation remains fruitful. If we study only what our tools can measure, we may confuse the map for the territory. If we refine our tools to include experience itself, a richer, more humane science of the person might emerge.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|
More Quotes by Stanislav
Add to List
