"Traditionalists are pessimists about the future and optimists about the past"
About this Quote
Mumford skewers “traditionalism” as an emotional posture masquerading as a philosophy: it’s less a coherent program than a split-screen mood. The line works because it flips the traditionalist’s self-image. Traditionalists often present themselves as hard-headed realists, wary of utopian schemes. Mumford replies: your “realism” is selective. You’re gloomy about what hasn’t happened yet, and rosy about what already did.
The craft is in the symmetry. “Pessimists about the future / optimists about the past” is a neat chiasmus of temperament, suggesting a bias built into the timeline itself. The future is judged by its risks; the past, by its curated highlights. That asymmetry is the subtext: memory gets edited, danger gets amplified. Tradition becomes a safe-room made of anecdotes.
Context matters. Mumford spent his career watching industrial modernity rewire cities, labor, and daily life, while critics of modernity romanticized pre-industrial social order. He wasn’t a cheerleader for every new machine; he warned about “megatechnics” and dehumanizing systems. So this isn’t a pro-progress sneer. It’s a diagnostic of nostalgia as an ideology: an impulse to treat yesterday’s compromises (hierarchies, exclusions, “stable” communities held together by coercion as much as fellowship) as a lost golden age.
The intent, then, is to expose how “tradition” can become a rhetorical shortcut: invoke the past as proof, treat the future as threat, and you never have to argue on the merits of present choices.
The craft is in the symmetry. “Pessimists about the future / optimists about the past” is a neat chiasmus of temperament, suggesting a bias built into the timeline itself. The future is judged by its risks; the past, by its curated highlights. That asymmetry is the subtext: memory gets edited, danger gets amplified. Tradition becomes a safe-room made of anecdotes.
Context matters. Mumford spent his career watching industrial modernity rewire cities, labor, and daily life, while critics of modernity romanticized pre-industrial social order. He wasn’t a cheerleader for every new machine; he warned about “megatechnics” and dehumanizing systems. So this isn’t a pro-progress sneer. It’s a diagnostic of nostalgia as an ideology: an impulse to treat yesterday’s compromises (hierarchies, exclusions, “stable” communities held together by coercion as much as fellowship) as a lost golden age.
The intent, then, is to expose how “tradition” can become a rhetorical shortcut: invoke the past as proof, treat the future as threat, and you never have to argue on the merits of present choices.
Quote Details
| Topic | Nostalgia |
|---|
More Quotes by Lewis
Add to List



