"Treating your adversary with respect is striking soft in battle"
About this Quote
That’s the subtext Johnson is prodding. He’s less worried about kindness than about how ethics get punished in competitive arenas. “Battle” can be read narrowly (war, dueling culture, political vendettas) or broadly (pamphlet wars, parliamentary debate, the reputational knife-fights of 18th-century London). Johnson lived amid public quarrels where rhetoric was a contact sport and concessions were treated as surrender. In that climate, treating an adversary with respect risks dissolving the sharp boundary that justifies aggression in the first place. It humanizes the target; it complicates the story you’re telling yourself.
The intent, then, isn’t to celebrate cruelty. It’s to name a grim reality about conflict: once you accept the logic of “battle,” you’re operating in a language where empathy reads as hesitation. Johnson, a writer with a moral spine and a realist’s eye, captures how quickly a culture can turn decency into a strategic error - and how that fear pressures people into performative hardness.
Quote Details
| Topic | Respect |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Johnson, Samuel. (2026, January 18). Treating your adversary with respect is striking soft in battle. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/treating-your-adversary-with-respect-is-striking-21110/
Chicago Style
Johnson, Samuel. "Treating your adversary with respect is striking soft in battle." FixQuotes. January 18, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/treating-your-adversary-with-respect-is-striking-21110/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"Treating your adversary with respect is striking soft in battle." FixQuotes, 18 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/treating-your-adversary-with-respect-is-striking-21110/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.









