"True time is four-dimensional"
About this Quote
Heidegger’s line sounds like physics until you remember he’s trying to pry “time” away from clocks, calendars, and the complacent idea that the present is the only real stage. “Four-dimensional” is bait: a modern, science-flavored phrase that smuggles in his deeper target, the way everyday life flattens time into a neutral sequence of “nows” you can schedule, spend, and waste. He’s not doing Einstein. He’s diagnosing a culture that treats being human as an object moving through a measurable container.
The subtext is that “true time” is not something we’re in; it’s something we are. In Being and Time, Heidegger argues that Dasein (the human way of existing) is structured by a temporal stretch: we’re thrown from a past we didn’t choose, projecting ourselves into futures we haven’t reached, while trying to make a livable present out of both. The “fourth dimension” isn’t an added coordinate so much as a rebuke to the idea that time is one-dimensional at all. The present only makes sense as a crossroads of retention (what still tugs on us) and anticipation (what pulls us forward). Even nostalgia and anxiety become evidence: emotions that reveal time as lived, not measured.
Context matters: early 20th-century Europe is intoxicated with scientific prestige and bureaucratic standardization, and philosophy is under pressure to sound “rigorous” by borrowing scientific vocabulary. Heidegger flips that prestige against itself, using a familiar modern term to argue that the most rigorous account of time has to start from existence, finitude, and care - not instruments.
The subtext is that “true time” is not something we’re in; it’s something we are. In Being and Time, Heidegger argues that Dasein (the human way of existing) is structured by a temporal stretch: we’re thrown from a past we didn’t choose, projecting ourselves into futures we haven’t reached, while trying to make a livable present out of both. The “fourth dimension” isn’t an added coordinate so much as a rebuke to the idea that time is one-dimensional at all. The present only makes sense as a crossroads of retention (what still tugs on us) and anticipation (what pulls us forward). Even nostalgia and anxiety become evidence: emotions that reveal time as lived, not measured.
Context matters: early 20th-century Europe is intoxicated with scientific prestige and bureaucratic standardization, and philosophy is under pressure to sound “rigorous” by borrowing scientific vocabulary. Heidegger flips that prestige against itself, using a familiar modern term to argue that the most rigorous account of time has to start from existence, finitude, and care - not instruments.
Quote Details
| Topic | Time |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Martin
Add to List






