"Two weeks before the attack on the USS Cole and then again two days before the attack, they saw through their analysis that a major event was going to occur in Yemen. They told the Navy not to bring the Cole into Yemen harbor. It went in and was attacked"
About this Quote
The line lands like a political grenade: not just that the USS Cole was attacked, but that the attack was legible in advance and still allowed to happen. Weldon builds this with a prosecutor’s rhythm - “two weeks before,” “again two days before” - stacking timestamps to make negligence feel undeniable. The repetition isn’t stylistic decoration; it’s a countdown that implies responsibility. By the time he gets to “They told the Navy,” the audience is primed to hear “and the Navy ignored them” even before he says it.
His specific intent is twofold. First, he’s laundering certainty through “analysis,” invoking the authority of intelligence work without naming sources or methods. Second, he’s shifting the moral center of the story from al-Qaeda’s act to an American failure of action. “It went in and was attacked” is blunt, almost passive, as if the ship’s movement were a bureaucratic inevitability rather than a command decision - which intensifies the implied scandal: if the outcome was foreseeable, why did the system behave like it wasn’t?
The subtext is classic Washington insurgency politics: someone knew, someone warned, someone higher up disregarded it, and the speaker is positioning himself as the one willing to say it out loud. Context matters here: the Cole bombing (October 2000) sits in the pre-9/11 archive of missed signals, a period later mined for narratives of institutional complacency. Weldon’s framing taps that cultural memory, inviting outrage at “the process” as much as the enemy.
His specific intent is twofold. First, he’s laundering certainty through “analysis,” invoking the authority of intelligence work without naming sources or methods. Second, he’s shifting the moral center of the story from al-Qaeda’s act to an American failure of action. “It went in and was attacked” is blunt, almost passive, as if the ship’s movement were a bureaucratic inevitability rather than a command decision - which intensifies the implied scandal: if the outcome was foreseeable, why did the system behave like it wasn’t?
The subtext is classic Washington insurgency politics: someone knew, someone warned, someone higher up disregarded it, and the speaker is positioning himself as the one willing to say it out loud. Context matters here: the Cole bombing (October 2000) sits in the pre-9/11 archive of missed signals, a period later mined for narratives of institutional complacency. Weldon’s framing taps that cultural memory, inviting outrage at “the process” as much as the enemy.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Curt
Add to List
