"Under the leadership of this President, the state of the union is not strong. We are being pulled apart rather than pulling together. Our democracy is suffering from the choices being made, and yet we are offered the same tired excuses and unrealistic analyses"
About this Quote
A state-of-the-union rebuttal lives or dies on contrast, and Jose Serrano builds his around a blunt inversion: not just "not improving", but "not strong". It’s a small rhetorical move that carries a big accusation: whatever prosperity or stability is being claimed from the podium is cosmetic, branding, a performance of national health that doesn’t survive contact with everyday reality. Serrano isn’t arguing policy line-by-line; he’s disputing the frame.
The heart of the quote is the passive-voice indictment that isn’t really passive at all: "Our democracy is suffering from the choices being made". He avoids naming the specific choices, which is strategic. It lets the sentence gather multiple grievances under one roof - voter suppression fights, corrosive partisanship, executive overreach, immigration crackdowns, widening inequality - while still pinning responsibility on leadership rather than fate. "Choices" signals intent. This wasn’t an accident; it was decided.
"Pulled apart rather than pulling together" is classic civic language, but Serrano uses it as a moral accusation, not nostalgia. Unity is framed as work (pulling) and division as force imposed on people (pulled), suggesting an administration benefiting from conflict while the public bears the strain.
The closer, "same tired excuses and unrealistic analyses", is aimed at the media-and-message ecosystem around a presidency: talking points, cherry-picked data, and pundit rationalizations that keep reappearing no matter the damage. Serrano’s intent is to deny legitimacy to the comforting story - and to insist the real crisis is institutional, not merely political.
The heart of the quote is the passive-voice indictment that isn’t really passive at all: "Our democracy is suffering from the choices being made". He avoids naming the specific choices, which is strategic. It lets the sentence gather multiple grievances under one roof - voter suppression fights, corrosive partisanship, executive overreach, immigration crackdowns, widening inequality - while still pinning responsibility on leadership rather than fate. "Choices" signals intent. This wasn’t an accident; it was decided.
"Pulled apart rather than pulling together" is classic civic language, but Serrano uses it as a moral accusation, not nostalgia. Unity is framed as work (pulling) and division as force imposed on people (pulled), suggesting an administration benefiting from conflict while the public bears the strain.
The closer, "same tired excuses and unrealistic analyses", is aimed at the media-and-message ecosystem around a presidency: talking points, cherry-picked data, and pundit rationalizations that keep reappearing no matter the damage. Serrano’s intent is to deny legitimacy to the comforting story - and to insist the real crisis is institutional, not merely political.
Quote Details
| Topic | Leadership |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Jose
Add to List


