"Until the control of the issue of currency and credit is restored to government and recognized as its most conspicuous and sacred responsibility, all talks of the sovereignty of Parliament and of democracy is idle and futile"
About this Quote
Mackenzie King is throwing a polite grenade into the living room of liberal democracy: you can hold all the elections you want, but if money is effectively governed elsewhere, the whole performance is theater. The line hinges on a redefinition of sovereignty. Parliament’s authority, he implies, isn’t primarily about passing laws or delivering speeches; it’s about controlling the machinery that decides who gets to build, borrow, hire, and survive. Currency and credit aren’t technical back-office functions in this framing. They’re the state’s real steering wheel.
The rhetoric works because it treats finance as moral terrain. Calling monetary control a “sacred responsibility” is deliberately provocative language from a politician: it drags central banking and credit creation out of the realm of “expertise” and into public ethics. That move also reveals the subtext: distrust of private financial power and the suspicion that democracy can be quietly hollowed out by institutions that never face voters. If wages, prices, and access to loans are set by forces insulated from public accountability, then popular sovereignty becomes a brand rather than a fact.
Context matters. King’s career spans the upheavals that made monetary policy impossible to dismiss as neutral: industrial conflict, the Great Depression, wartime financing, and the rise of modern central banking. The quote reads like an early warning about what we’d now call technocracy: governance by balance sheet. His intent is less to romanticize state power than to insist that democratic legitimacy has an economic floor. Without it, Parliament’s “sovereignty” is a paper crown.
The rhetoric works because it treats finance as moral terrain. Calling monetary control a “sacred responsibility” is deliberately provocative language from a politician: it drags central banking and credit creation out of the realm of “expertise” and into public ethics. That move also reveals the subtext: distrust of private financial power and the suspicion that democracy can be quietly hollowed out by institutions that never face voters. If wages, prices, and access to loans are set by forces insulated from public accountability, then popular sovereignty becomes a brand rather than a fact.
Context matters. King’s career spans the upheavals that made monetary policy impossible to dismiss as neutral: industrial conflict, the Great Depression, wartime financing, and the rise of modern central banking. The quote reads like an early warning about what we’d now call technocracy: governance by balance sheet. His intent is less to romanticize state power than to insist that democratic legitimacy has an economic floor. Without it, Parliament’s “sovereignty” is a paper crown.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by William
Add to List




