"Until the year 1967, it was a crime, for which you could be put in prison, to make homosexual love to someone in your own house. If they came in and caught you at it, you could be put into prison. This has changed - I'm talking about England, incidentally"
About this Quote
The line lands with the casual sting of a history lesson nobody should need. Patrick Macnee, an actor better known for suave escapism than moral testimony, delivers a blunt civic fact: in England, private intimacy between men was policed as criminal behavior until 1967. The sentence structure does the work. He repeats the idea of domestic space - "in your own house" - as if to underline how far the state once felt entitled to reach. The hypothetical "If they came in and caught you at it" is deliberately plain, almost conversational, which makes the violence of the scenario feel routine: surveillance, intrusion, arrest. No melodrama required.
Macnee's specific intent is to correct cultural amnesia. By anchoring the claim to a date and a concrete consequence (prison), he strips away the comforting myth that liberalization was gradual, natural, or inevitable. The subtext is sharper: if this was normal law within living memory, then today's debates about privacy, sexuality, and state power aren't abstract "culture war" theater - they're arguments about whether citizenship includes the right to be left alone.
The little aside, "I'm talking about England, incidentally", matters too. It's a defensive shrug and a quiet indictment. England likes to imagine itself as tolerant by default; Macnee reminds you that tolerance was legislated late, and only after decades of prosecutions that punished not public indecency but private affection. Coming from a mainstream figure, the message isn't niche advocacy. It's a warning about how quickly respectability can coexist with cruelty, and how easily a society can call it order.
Macnee's specific intent is to correct cultural amnesia. By anchoring the claim to a date and a concrete consequence (prison), he strips away the comforting myth that liberalization was gradual, natural, or inevitable. The subtext is sharper: if this was normal law within living memory, then today's debates about privacy, sexuality, and state power aren't abstract "culture war" theater - they're arguments about whether citizenship includes the right to be left alone.
The little aside, "I'm talking about England, incidentally", matters too. It's a defensive shrug and a quiet indictment. England likes to imagine itself as tolerant by default; Macnee reminds you that tolerance was legislated late, and only after decades of prosecutions that punished not public indecency but private affection. Coming from a mainstream figure, the message isn't niche advocacy. It's a warning about how quickly respectability can coexist with cruelty, and how easily a society can call it order.
Quote Details
| Topic | Human Rights |
|---|
More Quotes by Patrick
Add to List

