"U.S. assistance provides the Jordanian government needed flexibility to pursue policies that are of critical importance to U.S. national security and to foreign policy objectives in the Middle East"
About this Quote
“Needed flexibility” is the velvet phrase that makes hard power sound like a favor. Armitage, a national security operator speaking in the clipped idiom of Washington realism, isn’t really describing aid as charity or even partnership. He’s describing it as liquidity: cash and support that loosen a government’s constraints so it can move where the U.S. wants it to move, when domestic politics might otherwise stop it.
The intent is managerial. Jordan is framed less as a sovereign actor and more as a strategically located platform whose stability can be purchased and calibrated. “Policies of critical importance” stays conveniently vague, because specificity would invite moral scrutiny: intelligence cooperation, basing rights, border control, quiet alignment with U.S. and Israeli security priorities, and the containment of regional spillover from Iraq and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The quote’s genius is that it never has to name any of that. It just invokes “national security” like a seal of approval.
The subtext is transactional leverage. Assistance doesn’t merely help Jordan; it helps the Jordanian government do things that might be unpopular at home - tightening internal security, absorbing refugees, maintaining treaties - by cushioning economic backlash and reinforcing regime durability. “Flexibility” is also a euphemism for discretion: the ability to act without triggering immediate political costs, because U.S. support fills gaps and signals protection.
Context matters: Armitage’s era of policy was defined by post-Cold War consolidation and, soon after, the post-9/11 security state. In that world, aid is less a moral project than a tool for managing allies on a volatile map. The line works because it fuses altruism and instrumentality into one smooth bureaucratic sentence, letting everyone hear what they need to hear.
The intent is managerial. Jordan is framed less as a sovereign actor and more as a strategically located platform whose stability can be purchased and calibrated. “Policies of critical importance” stays conveniently vague, because specificity would invite moral scrutiny: intelligence cooperation, basing rights, border control, quiet alignment with U.S. and Israeli security priorities, and the containment of regional spillover from Iraq and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The quote’s genius is that it never has to name any of that. It just invokes “national security” like a seal of approval.
The subtext is transactional leverage. Assistance doesn’t merely help Jordan; it helps the Jordanian government do things that might be unpopular at home - tightening internal security, absorbing refugees, maintaining treaties - by cushioning economic backlash and reinforcing regime durability. “Flexibility” is also a euphemism for discretion: the ability to act without triggering immediate political costs, because U.S. support fills gaps and signals protection.
Context matters: Armitage’s era of policy was defined by post-Cold War consolidation and, soon after, the post-9/11 security state. In that world, aid is less a moral project than a tool for managing allies on a volatile map. The line works because it fuses altruism and instrumentality into one smooth bureaucratic sentence, letting everyone hear what they need to hear.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|
More Quotes by Richard
Add to List
