"Using adult stem cells drawn from bone marrow and umbilical cord blood system cells, scientists have discovered new treatments for scores of diseases and conditions such as Parkinson's disease, juvenile diabetes, and spinal cord injuries"
About this Quote
A politician invoking stem cells is never just talking science; he's drawing a moral border and daring opponents to argue from the wrong side of it. Nathan Deal’s sentence is engineered to sound like a lab report while doing the work of a campaign ad: specific inputs (bone marrow, umbilical cord blood), sweeping outputs (Parkinson’s, juvenile diabetes, spinal cord injuries), and a reassuring cadence that implies progress is already in motion.
The key move is the phrase “adult stem cells.” It’s a preemptive strike in the long U.S. culture war over embryonic stem cell research. By foregrounding sources widely seen as ethically uncontroversial, Deal offers a pro-research posture without stepping into the political minefield of embryo debates. “Umbilical cord blood” is especially strategic: it carries an aura of innocence and waste-not pragmatism, making the science feel both compassionate and commonsensical.
The list of diseases does emotional heavy lifting. It’s not a measured description of what current therapies can reliably do; it’s a roster of public fear and family tragedy, chosen to widen the coalition of listeners who might think, “This touches me.” “Scores of diseases” is elastic enough to promise abundance without accountability, while “scientists have discovered new treatments” borrows credibility from expertise without naming studies, timelines, or limits.
Contextually, this fits the era when conservatives sought to champion biomedical innovation while rejecting embryonic research: a rhetorical compromise that frames ethics as compatible with hope, and skepticism as cruelty.
The key move is the phrase “adult stem cells.” It’s a preemptive strike in the long U.S. culture war over embryonic stem cell research. By foregrounding sources widely seen as ethically uncontroversial, Deal offers a pro-research posture without stepping into the political minefield of embryo debates. “Umbilical cord blood” is especially strategic: it carries an aura of innocence and waste-not pragmatism, making the science feel both compassionate and commonsensical.
The list of diseases does emotional heavy lifting. It’s not a measured description of what current therapies can reliably do; it’s a roster of public fear and family tragedy, chosen to widen the coalition of listeners who might think, “This touches me.” “Scores of diseases” is elastic enough to promise abundance without accountability, while “scientists have discovered new treatments” borrows credibility from expertise without naming studies, timelines, or limits.
Contextually, this fits the era when conservatives sought to champion biomedical innovation while rejecting embryonic research: a rhetorical compromise that frames ethics as compatible with hope, and skepticism as cruelty.
Quote Details
| Topic | Health |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Nathan
Add to List

