"Usually, when the distractions of daily life deplete our energy, the first thing we eliminate is the thing we eliminate is the thing we need the most: quiet, reflective time. Time to dream, time to contemplate what's working and what's not, so that we can make changes for the better"
About this Quote
The sly tragedy in Sarah Ban Breathnach's observation is the self-defeating logic it exposes: when life gets loud, we cut the one practice that could help us live through the noise. She frames modern busyness as a kind of energy tax, and then names the perverse budget cut we always make first. Quiet, reflective time isn't treated as a luxury here; it's positioned as maintenance. Skip it long enough and you don't just feel tired, you lose the ability to steer.
Her repetition - "the thing we eliminate is the thing we eliminate is the thing we need the most" - reads like a verbal stumble on purpose, mimicking the mental loop of exhaustion. It's the syntax of burnout: saying the same sentence again because you can't quite get out of it. The line performs what it criticizes, which is why it lands.
The subtext is also a gentle indictment of productivity culture's false math. Reflection has no immediate deliverable, so it becomes expendable, even though it's the only space where priorities get clarified and habits get audited. She sneaks in a radical claim under the soothing language of self-care: dreaming and contemplating are not passive; they're decision-making tools. "What's working and what's not" is basically a performance review for your own life, one most people never schedule.
Contextually, this sits in late-20th/early-21st-century wellness discourse, but it avoids the usual platitudes by targeting the mechanism of collapse. Not "slow down", but: notice what you cut first, because that's your diagnosis.
Her repetition - "the thing we eliminate is the thing we eliminate is the thing we need the most" - reads like a verbal stumble on purpose, mimicking the mental loop of exhaustion. It's the syntax of burnout: saying the same sentence again because you can't quite get out of it. The line performs what it criticizes, which is why it lands.
The subtext is also a gentle indictment of productivity culture's false math. Reflection has no immediate deliverable, so it becomes expendable, even though it's the only space where priorities get clarified and habits get audited. She sneaks in a radical claim under the soothing language of self-care: dreaming and contemplating are not passive; they're decision-making tools. "What's working and what's not" is basically a performance review for your own life, one most people never schedule.
Contextually, this sits in late-20th/early-21st-century wellness discourse, but it avoids the usual platitudes by targeting the mechanism of collapse. Not "slow down", but: notice what you cut first, because that's your diagnosis.
Quote Details
| Topic | Self-Care |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Sarah
Add to List




