"Various are the pleas and arguments which men of corrupt minds frequently urge against yielding obedience to the just and holy commands of God"
About this Quote
Whitefield doesn’t bother courting neutrality; he opens with an x-ray. “Various are the pleas and arguments” sounds almost generous, like he’s willing to hear people out, but it’s a setup. The next phrase slams the door: these objections aren’t intellectual puzzles, they’re alibis produced by “corrupt minds.” In one move, he turns dissent into diagnosis. The argument is less about persuading skeptics than about stripping their skepticism of dignity.
That’s the specific intent: to reframe disobedience as moral evasiveness, not honest disagreement. Whitefield was a revivalist operator, preaching to crowds in the Great Awakening where the real contest wasn’t abstract theology; it was whether listeners would submit, publicly and emotionally, to conversion. By casting resistance as “pleas,” he implies courtroom theater - people improvising defenses because they already know the verdict. The vocabulary of “just and holy commands” makes God’s authority doubly fortified: legally right (“just”) and spiritually pure (“holy”). If the commands are both, there’s no principled place to stand outside them.
The subtext is social as much as spiritual. A movement built on urgency needs a way to sort the room quickly: the obedient are awakened; the objectors are not merely unconvinced but compromised. That framing inoculates the preacher against critique (“you’re only arguing because you’re corrupt”) and pressures the audience to distrust their own rationalizations. Whitefield’s genius - and danger - is how he moralizes the act of reasoning itself: arguments can be evidence of guilt. In a culture negotiating Enlightenment self-confidence and evangelical submission, that’s a power play dressed as piety.
That’s the specific intent: to reframe disobedience as moral evasiveness, not honest disagreement. Whitefield was a revivalist operator, preaching to crowds in the Great Awakening where the real contest wasn’t abstract theology; it was whether listeners would submit, publicly and emotionally, to conversion. By casting resistance as “pleas,” he implies courtroom theater - people improvising defenses because they already know the verdict. The vocabulary of “just and holy commands” makes God’s authority doubly fortified: legally right (“just”) and spiritually pure (“holy”). If the commands are both, there’s no principled place to stand outside them.
The subtext is social as much as spiritual. A movement built on urgency needs a way to sort the room quickly: the obedient are awakened; the objectors are not merely unconvinced but compromised. That framing inoculates the preacher against critique (“you’re only arguing because you’re corrupt”) and pressures the audience to distrust their own rationalizations. Whitefield’s genius - and danger - is how he moralizes the act of reasoning itself: arguments can be evidence of guilt. In a culture negotiating Enlightenment self-confidence and evangelical submission, that’s a power play dressed as piety.
Quote Details
| Topic | God |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by George
Add to List








