"Veterans continue to get the short end of the stick when it comes to this administration"
About this Quote
“Short end of the stick” is deliberately plainspoken, almost kitchen-table language, and that’s the point: Corrine Brown is translating a sprawling policy fight into a moral imbalance anyone can picture. Veterans, in American politics, are a near-sacred constituency; invoking them isn’t just a policy critique, it’s an accusation of violated obligation. By framing the issue as veterans being actively shortchanged “when it comes to this administration,” she turns bureaucratic outcomes into a character judgment. The administration isn’t merely making hard tradeoffs; it’s failing people who’ve already paid in advance.
The intent is twofold: to rally public sympathy and to claim the high ground over opponents who typically wrap themselves in patriotic imagery. Brown’s phrasing quietly implies a hierarchy of deservingness: if even veterans are getting stiffed, what does that say about the governing philosophy at large? It’s also a strategic move in the evergreen Washington battle over ownership of “supporting the troops.” Her line asks voters to separate symbolic respect (praise, flags, speeches) from material respect (benefits, care, timely services).
Subtextually, the quote leans on a familiar suspicion: administrations love to celebrate service members in public while nickel-and-diming them in budgets, staffing, and implementation. The vagueness is useful. She doesn’t specify the cut, delay, or program failure, which lets the statement function as a flexible indictment - applicable to VA backlogs, benefits disputes, underfunded healthcare, or broken promises - while keeping the emotional verdict intact.
The intent is twofold: to rally public sympathy and to claim the high ground over opponents who typically wrap themselves in patriotic imagery. Brown’s phrasing quietly implies a hierarchy of deservingness: if even veterans are getting stiffed, what does that say about the governing philosophy at large? It’s also a strategic move in the evergreen Washington battle over ownership of “supporting the troops.” Her line asks voters to separate symbolic respect (praise, flags, speeches) from material respect (benefits, care, timely services).
Subtextually, the quote leans on a familiar suspicion: administrations love to celebrate service members in public while nickel-and-diming them in budgets, staffing, and implementation. The vagueness is useful. She doesn’t specify the cut, delay, or program failure, which lets the statement function as a flexible indictment - applicable to VA backlogs, benefits disputes, underfunded healthcare, or broken promises - while keeping the emotional verdict intact.
Quote Details
| Topic | Military & Soldier |
|---|
More Quotes by Corrine
Add to List
