"Wal-Mart doesn't really care about your faith. Wal-Mart cares if you have money to spend, and it is going to be as generic as possible in exploiting the holiday season for every buck it can make"
About this Quote
Roeper skewers Wal-Mart with the bluntest instrument in the critic’s toolbox: saying the quiet part out loud. The jab isn’t that a retailer sells holiday stuff - it’s that the company’s so fluent in market logic that belief itself becomes irrelevant except as a purchasing trigger. “Faith” is invoked as a kind of civic alibi people want corporations to have; Roeper denies them that comfort. In his framing, the only liturgy that matters is checkout.
The line works because it collapses a culture-war debate into a simpler, uglier motive. When people argue about whether stores are “erasing Christmas” or pandering to certain religions, they’re treating corporate messaging like ideology. Roeper treats it like strategy: maximum audience, minimum friction. “Generic as possible” isn’t just aesthetic critique, it’s a business model - sand down anything that might alienate a shopper, then repackage the season as a neutral, purchasable mood. The bite is in “exploiting,” a verb that makes the relationship asymmetrical: the holiday isn’t celebrated, it’s harvested.
Contextually, this lives in the long-running American argument about commercialization of sacred or communal rituals, sharpened by big-box dominance. Wal-Mart becomes shorthand for scale: when one retailer can set the tone for the season, it can also flatten the season’s meaning. Roeper’s intent isn’t to defend faith so much as to puncture the fantasy that a corporation is ever having a moral conversation with you. It’s running a test. If you spend, you belong.
The line works because it collapses a culture-war debate into a simpler, uglier motive. When people argue about whether stores are “erasing Christmas” or pandering to certain religions, they’re treating corporate messaging like ideology. Roeper treats it like strategy: maximum audience, minimum friction. “Generic as possible” isn’t just aesthetic critique, it’s a business model - sand down anything that might alienate a shopper, then repackage the season as a neutral, purchasable mood. The bite is in “exploiting,” a verb that makes the relationship asymmetrical: the holiday isn’t celebrated, it’s harvested.
Contextually, this lives in the long-running American argument about commercialization of sacred or communal rituals, sharpened by big-box dominance. Wal-Mart becomes shorthand for scale: when one retailer can set the tone for the season, it can also flatten the season’s meaning. Roeper’s intent isn’t to defend faith so much as to puncture the fantasy that a corporation is ever having a moral conversation with you. It’s running a test. If you spend, you belong.
Quote Details
| Topic | Marketing |
|---|
More Quotes by Richard
Add to List


