"Wanting something is not enough. You must hunger for it. Your motivation must be absolutely compelling in order to overcome the obstacles that will invariably come your way"
About this Quote
Les Brown’s line reads like a splash of cold water on the self-help genre’s favorite soft spot: the comforting idea that desire, declared out loud, is destiny. He draws a hard border between “want” and “hunger,” borrowing the language of the body to shame the mind out of half-commitment. Hunger isn’t cute. It’s not a Pinterest affirmation. It’s discomfort that demands action. That’s the psychological trick here: if you can reframe your goal as a biological necessity, you stop negotiating with yourself.
The subtext is pragmatic and a little accusatory: if you quit, it wasn’t because the world was unfair; it was because you didn’t want it badly enough. Brown isn’t offering sympathy, he’s offering a sorting mechanism. “Absolutely compelling” is doing a lot of work. It suggests that motivation can’t be vague (“I’d like to be successful”) or aesthetic (“it would be nice”); it has to be specific enough to survive friction, embarrassment, boredom, and rejection. Those are the “obstacles” he treats as inevitable, not exceptional. That word “invariably” matters: he’s normalizing setbacks so they stop feeling like personal omens.
Contextually, this is classic late-20th-century American motivational rhetoric, built for audiences trying to climb without a safety net: entrepreneurs, strivers, people sold the promise of mobility but left to manage the grind alone. The appeal is fierce accountability; the risk is that it can flatten structural realities into a single moral diagnosis. Still, as a piece of persuasion, it works because it makes quitting feel less like a choice and more like a confession.
The subtext is pragmatic and a little accusatory: if you quit, it wasn’t because the world was unfair; it was because you didn’t want it badly enough. Brown isn’t offering sympathy, he’s offering a sorting mechanism. “Absolutely compelling” is doing a lot of work. It suggests that motivation can’t be vague (“I’d like to be successful”) or aesthetic (“it would be nice”); it has to be specific enough to survive friction, embarrassment, boredom, and rejection. Those are the “obstacles” he treats as inevitable, not exceptional. That word “invariably” matters: he’s normalizing setbacks so they stop feeling like personal omens.
Contextually, this is classic late-20th-century American motivational rhetoric, built for audiences trying to climb without a safety net: entrepreneurs, strivers, people sold the promise of mobility but left to manage the grind alone. The appeal is fierce accountability; the risk is that it can flatten structural realities into a single moral diagnosis. Still, as a piece of persuasion, it works because it makes quitting feel less like a choice and more like a confession.
Quote Details
| Topic | Motivational |
|---|
More Quotes by Les
Add to List








