"Watching President Obama apologize last week for America's arrogance - before a French audience that owes its freedom to the sacrifices of Americans - helped convince me that he has a deep-seated antipathy toward American values and traditions"
About this Quote
Santorum’s line is less an observation about diplomacy than a loyalty test disguised as outrage. By framing Obama’s remarks as an “apology for America’s arrogance,” he turns a familiar presidential move - acknowledging flaws to gain credibility abroad - into a moral transgression. The phrase “before a French audience” isn’t neutral staging; it’s a coded provocation. In American political shorthand, “France” can function as a stand-in for effete ingratitude and moral softness. Santorum leans on that stereotype so the scene feels like humiliation rather than statecraft.
The kicker is the ledger-keeping: France “owes its freedom” to American “sacrifices.” That World War II invocation is doing heavy emotional labor. It recasts international relationships as permanent debt, and it positions criticism of American conduct as betrayal of fallen soldiers. The appeal isn’t to policy outcomes but to reverence: if the past is sacred, then present-day nuance becomes suspect.
“Helped convince me” and “deep-seated antipathy” are also carefully chosen. Santorum isn’t arguing that Obama made a tactical mistake; he’s alleging a defect of character, even of identity. “American values and traditions” stays conveniently undefined, a floating signifier that allows listeners to fill in their own list - exceptionalism, toughness, religious patriotism, military pride - and then feel them threatened.
In context, this is primary-season rhetoric: it collapses complex questions about America’s global role into a simple binary of pride versus self-hatred. The subtext is that legitimacy comes from performative certainty, and any gesture of humility is evidence for the prosecution.
The kicker is the ledger-keeping: France “owes its freedom” to American “sacrifices.” That World War II invocation is doing heavy emotional labor. It recasts international relationships as permanent debt, and it positions criticism of American conduct as betrayal of fallen soldiers. The appeal isn’t to policy outcomes but to reverence: if the past is sacred, then present-day nuance becomes suspect.
“Helped convince me” and “deep-seated antipathy” are also carefully chosen. Santorum isn’t arguing that Obama made a tactical mistake; he’s alleging a defect of character, even of identity. “American values and traditions” stays conveniently undefined, a floating signifier that allows listeners to fill in their own list - exceptionalism, toughness, religious patriotism, military pride - and then feel them threatened.
In context, this is primary-season rhetoric: it collapses complex questions about America’s global role into a simple binary of pride versus self-hatred. The subtext is that legitimacy comes from performative certainty, and any gesture of humility is evidence for the prosecution.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Rick
Add to List


