"We all join the President in applauding the sacrifices made by our brave men and women in uniform. But we must continue to provide them the tools they need to accomplish the difficult tasks they face"
About this Quote
A familiar Washington two-step: praise the troops, then pivot to a policy demand that sounds unassailable. Durbin’s line is built to occupy moral high ground while quietly cornering his audience. “We all join the President” signals bipartisan choreography, wrapping his point in consensus and patriotism before anyone can object. The applause is obligatory; the “but” is the payload.
The subtext is less about gratitude than leverage. By foregrounding “sacrifices” and “brave men and women in uniform,” Durbin activates a near-sacred civic language that few lawmakers want to be seen resisting. Once that frame is set, “we must continue” turns support into duty, and “provide them the tools” recasts a political choice as basic maintenance. “Tools” is the key euphemism: it can mean armor, mental health services, training, veterans’ care, or, most commonly in congressional debate, money and authorization for ongoing operations. The phrase is broad enough to dodge specifics and narrow enough to shame dissent: who would deny soldiers the tools they need?
Contextually, this is the rhetoric of wartime governance in a divided legislature: show deference to the commander-in-chief while keeping Congress in the role of responsible steward. It’s also a prophylactic against the charge of being “anti-troop” or “soft” on security, especially for Democrats navigating post-9/11 politics. The line works because it turns policy into a moral test, then dares opponents to vote against the uniform rather than the bill.
The subtext is less about gratitude than leverage. By foregrounding “sacrifices” and “brave men and women in uniform,” Durbin activates a near-sacred civic language that few lawmakers want to be seen resisting. Once that frame is set, “we must continue” turns support into duty, and “provide them the tools” recasts a political choice as basic maintenance. “Tools” is the key euphemism: it can mean armor, mental health services, training, veterans’ care, or, most commonly in congressional debate, money and authorization for ongoing operations. The phrase is broad enough to dodge specifics and narrow enough to shame dissent: who would deny soldiers the tools they need?
Contextually, this is the rhetoric of wartime governance in a divided legislature: show deference to the commander-in-chief while keeping Congress in the role of responsible steward. It’s also a prophylactic against the charge of being “anti-troop” or “soft” on security, especially for Democrats navigating post-9/11 politics. The line works because it turns policy into a moral test, then dares opponents to vote against the uniform rather than the bill.
Quote Details
| Topic | Military & Soldier |
|---|
More Quotes by Dick
Add to List
