"We always deceive ourselves twice about the people we love - first to their advantage, then to their disadvantage"
About this Quote
Love, for Camus, isn’t a soft-focus refuge from reality; it’s one of reality’s most efficient distortion engines. The line’s punch is in its grim symmetry: we “deceive ourselves twice,” as if self-deception isn’t an accident but a built-in feature of attachment. First comes the generous lie. We edit the beloved into a more coherent, more admirable figure than the evidence allows, because the story of them has to justify the risk we’re taking. Idealization isn’t merely sentimental; it’s a wager against the absurd. If the world won’t supply meaning, we’ll manufacture it in a person.
Then the pendulum swings. When the beloved fails to match the mythology we wrote for them (and they always will), the second deception arrives: resentment disguised as clarity. We reframe their ordinary human limitations as proof of a deeper flaw, not because we’ve become more honest, but because disillusionment needs a culprit. The “disadvantage” phase is a kind of emotional cost-cutting: tearing down the earlier investment so we can feel less foolish for having believed.
Camus’s subtext is bleakly modern: we’re not just bad at seeing others; we’re strategically bad, toggling between canonization and prosecution to protect our ego. The sentence also reads like a warning against the romance of certainty. In Camus’s moral universe, lucidity is hard, love is messy, and the temptation to replace a person with a narrative is constant. The real ethical challenge isn’t loving more; it’s perceiving without needing the beloved to save us from the chaos.
Then the pendulum swings. When the beloved fails to match the mythology we wrote for them (and they always will), the second deception arrives: resentment disguised as clarity. We reframe their ordinary human limitations as proof of a deeper flaw, not because we’ve become more honest, but because disillusionment needs a culprit. The “disadvantage” phase is a kind of emotional cost-cutting: tearing down the earlier investment so we can feel less foolish for having believed.
Camus’s subtext is bleakly modern: we’re not just bad at seeing others; we’re strategically bad, toggling between canonization and prosecution to protect our ego. The sentence also reads like a warning against the romance of certainty. In Camus’s moral universe, lucidity is hard, love is messy, and the temptation to replace a person with a narrative is constant. The real ethical challenge isn’t loving more; it’s perceiving without needing the beloved to save us from the chaos.
Quote Details
| Topic | Love |
|---|
More Quotes by Albert
Add to List









