"We always love those who admire us, but we do not always love those whom we admire"
About this Quote
Flattery is the one currency that rarely gets rejected, and La Rochefoucauld treats that fact with the cold confidence of someone who watched it operate in real time. Writing out of the courtly ecosystem of 17th-century France, he understood admiration not as a pure emotion but as a social instrument: it oils hierarchies, buys protection, and makes egos feel inevitable. The line lands because it exposes a mismatch between two forms of “seeing.” To admire is to look up; to be admired is to be confirmed. One risks humiliation, the other offers gratification.
The subtext is sharper than the aphorism’s smooth surface. “We always love those who admire us” isn’t romantic; it’s diagnostic. It implies that what we call love often begins as self-love with better PR. Admiration aimed at us functions like a mirror that flatters back, so affection arrives quickly, even if the admirer is otherwise unremarkable. The second clause twists the knife: our admiration doesn’t guarantee warmth because it can be laced with envy, distance, or resentment. We can revere talent, virtue, or status and still find the person unbearable, or simply irrelevant to our emotional needs.
Rochefoucauld’s intent isn’t to preach moral improvement; it’s to puncture moral theater. Court culture prized elegance and loyalty while running on vanity and competition. His sentence is compact, balanced, almost polite - and that’s the trick. It mimics the poise of high society while smuggling in an accusation: much of what passes for attachment is a response to being valued, not a commitment to value someone else.
The subtext is sharper than the aphorism’s smooth surface. “We always love those who admire us” isn’t romantic; it’s diagnostic. It implies that what we call love often begins as self-love with better PR. Admiration aimed at us functions like a mirror that flatters back, so affection arrives quickly, even if the admirer is otherwise unremarkable. The second clause twists the knife: our admiration doesn’t guarantee warmth because it can be laced with envy, distance, or resentment. We can revere talent, virtue, or status and still find the person unbearable, or simply irrelevant to our emotional needs.
Rochefoucauld’s intent isn’t to preach moral improvement; it’s to puncture moral theater. Court culture prized elegance and loyalty while running on vanity and competition. His sentence is compact, balanced, almost polite - and that’s the trick. It mimics the poise of high society while smuggling in an accusation: much of what passes for attachment is a response to being valued, not a commitment to value someone else.
Quote Details
| Topic | Love |
|---|
More Quotes by Francois
Add to List








