"We appear to be programmed with the idea that there are 'things' outside of our self, and some are conscious, and some are not"
About this Quote
Kurzweil’s line has the cool, slightly unnerving calm of a technologist pointing at a “default setting” most of us never notice. He isn’t arguing about whether consciousness exists; he’s arguing about how our minds package reality into categories that feel obvious: me versus not-me, agent versus object, alive versus inert. “Programmed” is the tell. It smuggles a software metaphor into philosophy, implying that what we treat as common sense might be a heuristic written by evolution and reinforced by culture - useful for survival, not necessarily accurate.
The subtext is classic Kurzweil: if the boundaries between self and world are cognitive constructions, then the line we draw around “conscious beings” is negotiable. That matters in an era of chatbots, social robots, and increasingly persuasive machine behavior. Humans already attribute minds to pets, cars, storms, even brands; we do it reflexively. Kurzweil is nudging you to see consciousness-attribution as a feature of the observer, not a property you can reliably read off the observed.
Contextually, this sits inside his broader project of normalizing radical shifts: mind uploading, machine consciousness, the idea that intelligence is substrate-independent. By framing our intuition of “things outside the self” as a kind of mental firmware, he loosens the grip of human exceptionalism. It’s less a claim about what machines are today than a strategic reframe of what we’ll be willing to recognize tomorrow - and how easily we might be fooled, or transformed, by our own pattern-hungry cognition.
The subtext is classic Kurzweil: if the boundaries between self and world are cognitive constructions, then the line we draw around “conscious beings” is negotiable. That matters in an era of chatbots, social robots, and increasingly persuasive machine behavior. Humans already attribute minds to pets, cars, storms, even brands; we do it reflexively. Kurzweil is nudging you to see consciousness-attribution as a feature of the observer, not a property you can reliably read off the observed.
Contextually, this sits inside his broader project of normalizing radical shifts: mind uploading, machine consciousness, the idea that intelligence is substrate-independent. By framing our intuition of “things outside the self” as a kind of mental firmware, he loosens the grip of human exceptionalism. It’s less a claim about what machines are today than a strategic reframe of what we’ll be willing to recognize tomorrow - and how easily we might be fooled, or transformed, by our own pattern-hungry cognition.
Quote Details
| Topic | Deep |
|---|
More Quotes by Ray
Add to List




