"We are a studying nation. Scholarship from science is important to the whole world and those people need to be able to be safe and secure in what they do"
About this Quote
"Studying nation" is the kind of phrase that tries to turn a budget line into a civic identity. Malcolm Wallop, a politician by trade, frames research not as a niche concern of universities but as a national posture: America as a country defined by inquiry, not just industry or arms. It’s aspirational branding, and it’s strategic. If you can make scholarship sound like patriotism, you can ask the public to treat labs and libraries the way it treats borders and bases.
The syntax does quiet but deliberate work. "Scholarship from science" collapses basic research, applied research, and academic prestige into one legitimizing bundle. "Important to the whole world" widens the moral radius: funding and protecting science becomes an act of global stewardship, not parochial self-interest. That move flatters the nation while also insulating the argument from partisan squabbles. Who wants to be the lawmaker who voted against something "important to the whole world"?
Then comes the real tell: "safe and secure in what they do". Wallop isn’t only praising curiosity; he’s responding to vulnerability. Depending on era, that can point to Cold War anxieties (spies, sabotage), domestic backlash (politicized research), or even threats and intimidation aimed at scientists. The subtext is a promise: we’ll protect the people who generate knowledge, because their work underwrites everything from defense to medicine to economic advantage. It’s science as soft power, recast in the hard language of security.
The syntax does quiet but deliberate work. "Scholarship from science" collapses basic research, applied research, and academic prestige into one legitimizing bundle. "Important to the whole world" widens the moral radius: funding and protecting science becomes an act of global stewardship, not parochial self-interest. That move flatters the nation while also insulating the argument from partisan squabbles. Who wants to be the lawmaker who voted against something "important to the whole world"?
Then comes the real tell: "safe and secure in what they do". Wallop isn’t only praising curiosity; he’s responding to vulnerability. Depending on era, that can point to Cold War anxieties (spies, sabotage), domestic backlash (politicized research), or even threats and intimidation aimed at scientists. The subtext is a promise: we’ll protect the people who generate knowledge, because their work underwrites everything from defense to medicine to economic advantage. It’s science as soft power, recast in the hard language of security.
Quote Details
| Topic | Science |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Malcolm
Add to List




