"We are, by many measures, one of the more diverse cities in the country, growing more diverse all the time, and one of the more harmonious in terms of how we live together"
About this Quote
A politician’s compliment is never just a compliment; it’s a claim on the narrative. Hickenlooper’s line is built to do two things at once: brand the city as morally modern and preempt the suspicion that “diverse” inevitably means “fractured.” The phrase “by many measures” is the tell. It nods to data without naming any, borrowing the authority of statistics while leaving him room to define success broadly enough that no single metric can puncture the message.
“Growing more diverse all the time” frames demographic change as momentum, not disruption. That’s governance by reassurance: newcomers aren’t a problem to be managed, they’re proof the city is thriving. The second clause, “one of the more harmonious,” is the political magic trick. Harmony is a vibes word, hard to falsify, easy to celebrate. It softens anxieties about race, migration, and class into a story of convivial coexistence.
The subtext is a defense against national headlines. In an era when American cities are cast as either multicultural utopias or powder kegs, he wants his city filed under “model.” It also signals competence: if people “live together” well, then leadership must be steady, institutions functional, civic culture mature. What’s left unsaid is the cost of that harmony: who defines it, who is asked to be quiet to preserve it, and whether calm reflects justice or simply well-managed inequality. The sentence sells unity; it also quietly demands it.
“Growing more diverse all the time” frames demographic change as momentum, not disruption. That’s governance by reassurance: newcomers aren’t a problem to be managed, they’re proof the city is thriving. The second clause, “one of the more harmonious,” is the political magic trick. Harmony is a vibes word, hard to falsify, easy to celebrate. It softens anxieties about race, migration, and class into a story of convivial coexistence.
The subtext is a defense against national headlines. In an era when American cities are cast as either multicultural utopias or powder kegs, he wants his city filed under “model.” It also signals competence: if people “live together” well, then leadership must be steady, institutions functional, civic culture mature. What’s left unsaid is the cost of that harmony: who defines it, who is asked to be quiet to preserve it, and whether calm reflects justice or simply well-managed inequality. The sentence sells unity; it also quietly demands it.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|
More Quotes by John
Add to List





