"We are increasingly recognising and accepting, respecting and celebrating, our cultural diversity"
About this Quote
The line lands like a velvet-gloved statecraft move: warm, inclusive, and carefully calibrated to offend no one with actual specificity. Julie Bishop’s rhythm matters here. The four-step escalation - recognising, accepting, respecting, celebrating - is a political staircase, each verb offering a slightly higher moral vantage point while avoiding the messy question of what any step requires in practice. It’s aspirational language that lets a government sound progressive without committing to policy that might anger voters who hear “diversity” as disruption rather than enrichment.
The intent is reassurance. “Increasingly” does crucial work: it implies momentum and inevitability, suggesting the nation is already on the right track. That softens anxieties about social change by framing multiculturalism not as a contested agenda but as a natural evolution. It also flatters the audience. If “we” are doing this, then “we” are decent, modern, and mature. The collective pronoun dissolves conflict, absorbing dissent into a supposedly shared national project.
The subtext is where the politics sharpen. “Cultural diversity” is invoked as a civic virtue, but its frictions are politely edited out - debates over immigration, Indigenous recognition, religious difference, racism, national security, and who gets to define “Australian values.” In the Australian context, especially from a senior Liberal figure, that rhetorical balance is the point: signal openness to pluralism while maintaining a broad, stabilizing idea of national cohesion. It’s less a diagnosis than a performance of unity, designed for a country still arguing about whose stories sit at the center.
The intent is reassurance. “Increasingly” does crucial work: it implies momentum and inevitability, suggesting the nation is already on the right track. That softens anxieties about social change by framing multiculturalism not as a contested agenda but as a natural evolution. It also flatters the audience. If “we” are doing this, then “we” are decent, modern, and mature. The collective pronoun dissolves conflict, absorbing dissent into a supposedly shared national project.
The subtext is where the politics sharpen. “Cultural diversity” is invoked as a civic virtue, but its frictions are politely edited out - debates over immigration, Indigenous recognition, religious difference, racism, national security, and who gets to define “Australian values.” In the Australian context, especially from a senior Liberal figure, that rhetorical balance is the point: signal openness to pluralism while maintaining a broad, stabilizing idea of national cohesion. It’s less a diagnosis than a performance of unity, designed for a country still arguing about whose stories sit at the center.
Quote Details
| Topic | Respect |
|---|
More Quotes by Julie
Add to List








