"We are not against religions. This country is the cradle of prophecy and the true message and we will not contradict this"
About this Quote
A royal reassurance that sounds tolerant on the surface but reads, in context, like a boundary marker. “We are not against religions” is less an embrace of pluralism than a preemptive rebuttal to an accusation: that the Saudi state, with its austere religious establishment and restrictions on public non-Islamic worship, is hostile to religious difference. The line performs diplomatic triage, aimed outward at Western audiences and inward at domestic clerics: calm the critics without yielding sovereignty over the terms of tolerance.
Then comes the pivot: “This country is the cradle of prophecy and the true message.” It’s a claim of exceptional jurisdiction. By naming Saudi Arabia not just as a Muslim-majority state but as the birthplace of Islam, the speaker converts policy into destiny. Any critique becomes, implicitly, a critique of sacred provenance. “The true message” isn’t merely theological; it’s political branding, a way to fuse national legitimacy with custodianship of Islam’s holiest sites, and to frame the regime as guardian rather than negotiator.
The final clause, “we will not contradict this,” lands like a closing door. It signals that tolerance, whatever its limits, cannot extend to public practices or reforms perceived as challenging the state-backed religious order. The intent is to define permissible diversity: other religions may exist, privately and abstractly, but they cannot compete in the public sphere with the “true message.” In the years after 9/11 and amid recurring scrutiny of Saudi religious influence, that distinction mattered: it’s a statement designed to look like openness while hardening the terms of control.
Then comes the pivot: “This country is the cradle of prophecy and the true message.” It’s a claim of exceptional jurisdiction. By naming Saudi Arabia not just as a Muslim-majority state but as the birthplace of Islam, the speaker converts policy into destiny. Any critique becomes, implicitly, a critique of sacred provenance. “The true message” isn’t merely theological; it’s political branding, a way to fuse national legitimacy with custodianship of Islam’s holiest sites, and to frame the regime as guardian rather than negotiator.
The final clause, “we will not contradict this,” lands like a closing door. It signals that tolerance, whatever its limits, cannot extend to public practices or reforms perceived as challenging the state-backed religious order. The intent is to define permissible diversity: other religions may exist, privately and abstractly, but they cannot compete in the public sphere with the “true message.” In the years after 9/11 and amid recurring scrutiny of Saudi religious influence, that distinction mattered: it’s a statement designed to look like openness while hardening the terms of control.
Quote Details
| Topic | Faith |
|---|
More Quotes by Sultan
Add to List




