"We are part of a country that outshines those that have gone before us and most of those in existence today"
About this Quote
Ambrose’s line is boosterism with a historian’s credentials, and that’s precisely why it lands. “We are part of” opens as an invitation, not an argument: you’re not being asked to evaluate evidence so much as to join a story. The grammar does cultural work. It converts national identity into a shared membership card, then immediately cashes it in with “outshines,” a word that smuggles in an aesthetic judgment - brightness, glamour, inevitability - rather than a measurable claim. “Those that have gone before us” nods toward the past with a vague reverence, but it also quietly declares the past obsolete. Progress isn’t debated; it’s assumed.
The subtext is classic American exceptionalism, tuned for late-20th-century confidence. Ambrose built a public career narrating World War II, the “Greatest Generation,” and the frontier-to-superpower arc in a voice that made history feel like a moral inheritance. In that context, “outshines” functions as a reward for collective sacrifice: the nation’s current stature is framed as earned, almost sacred, and therefore less open to critique.
“Most of those in existence today” is the sharper edge. It’s comparative, competitive, and conveniently imprecise - “most” creates a leaderboard without naming criteria or rivals. The intent isn’t to persuade skeptics; it’s to consolidate pride, to make belonging feel like being on the winning team. As rhetoric, it’s effective because it flatters the listener while dissolving complexity, turning history into a spotlight aimed squarely at “we.”
The subtext is classic American exceptionalism, tuned for late-20th-century confidence. Ambrose built a public career narrating World War II, the “Greatest Generation,” and the frontier-to-superpower arc in a voice that made history feel like a moral inheritance. In that context, “outshines” functions as a reward for collective sacrifice: the nation’s current stature is framed as earned, almost sacred, and therefore less open to critique.
“Most of those in existence today” is the sharper edge. It’s comparative, competitive, and conveniently imprecise - “most” creates a leaderboard without naming criteria or rivals. The intent isn’t to persuade skeptics; it’s to consolidate pride, to make belonging feel like being on the winning team. As rhetoric, it’s effective because it flatters the listener while dissolving complexity, turning history into a spotlight aimed squarely at “we.”
Quote Details
| Topic | Pride |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Stephen
Add to List




