"We are prophetic interrogators. Why are so many people hungry? Why are so many people and families in our shelters? Why do we have one of six of our children poor, and one of three of these are children of color? 'Why?' is the prophetic question"
About this Quote
"Prophetic interrogators" is a daring rebrand: Wallis takes the old religious role of the prophet and strips it of mysticism, turning it into a public-facing practice of moral investigation. The engine here is the repetition of "Why?" not as curiosity but as indictment. Each question is a lever prying open what polite society tries to keep shut: hunger isn’t an accident, shelters aren’t a natural feature of the landscape, child poverty isn’t a regrettable but unavoidable statistic. The cadence mimics a cross-examination, forcing listeners to confront causation, not charity.
The subtext is a critique of how American politics and even American faith often manage suffering: we rush to treat symptoms (food drives, temporary beds) while avoiding the structural decisions that produce them (wages, housing policy, healthcare access, racialized inequality). By naming that "one of three" poor children are children of color, Wallis refuses the comforting fiction that poverty is evenly distributed or morally neutral. He’s signaling that racial inequity isn’t a side issue; it’s a diagnostic clue.
Context matters: Wallis comes out of the faith-and-justice tradition that resists both secular technocracy and culture-war moralism. He’s not asking believers to be nicer; he’s asking them to be harder on power. The "prophetic" move is to keep the question open until it becomes politically expensive to ignore.
The subtext is a critique of how American politics and even American faith often manage suffering: we rush to treat symptoms (food drives, temporary beds) while avoiding the structural decisions that produce them (wages, housing policy, healthcare access, racialized inequality). By naming that "one of three" poor children are children of color, Wallis refuses the comforting fiction that poverty is evenly distributed or morally neutral. He’s signaling that racial inequity isn’t a side issue; it’s a diagnostic clue.
Context matters: Wallis comes out of the faith-and-justice tradition that resists both secular technocracy and culture-war moralism. He’s not asking believers to be nicer; he’s asking them to be harder on power. The "prophetic" move is to keep the question open until it becomes politically expensive to ignore.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by Jim
Add to List
