"We are well aware from which countries and through which countries the terrorists are receiving support. In the immediate future I shall be calling upon the leaders of these states to put a stop to this kind of activity"
About this Quote
Yeltsin’s sentence is a threat dressed up as procedural diplomacy, and the tailoring matters. “We are well aware” is the loaded opener: not evidence presented, but omniscience asserted. It’s meant to project a state that sees everything, even as post-Soviet Russia in the 1990s was bleeding authority, fighting wars on its periphery, and wrestling with the humiliations of a newly unipolar world. The line functions like a sovereignty bandage: if Moscow can’t fully control violence at home, it can at least claim mastery over the map of blame.
The phrase “from which countries and through which countries” widens the target set. It doesn’t only accuse alleged sponsors; it also indicts transit states, the quiet middlemen, the borderlands that become convenient pressure points. That ambiguity is strategic. It gives Yeltsin leverage without committing to specifics, keeping multiple governments guessing about whether they’re being warned, recruited, or set up as a public example.
“In the immediate future” signals urgency but also choreography. It tells domestic audiences that the Kremlin is acting, and tells foreign leaders that the next conversation won’t be friendly. “Calling upon the leaders” sounds like a polite invitation; in Russian presidential register, it’s closer to a summons. The subtext is conditional: stop “this kind of activity,” or Russia will reserve the right to escalate - diplomatically, economically, or militarily - while framing any escalation as reluctant self-defense.
It’s rhetoric built for plausible deniability: firm enough to intimidate, vague enough to maneuver, and calibrated to reassert Russia as a security power that still gets to name the threats.
The phrase “from which countries and through which countries” widens the target set. It doesn’t only accuse alleged sponsors; it also indicts transit states, the quiet middlemen, the borderlands that become convenient pressure points. That ambiguity is strategic. It gives Yeltsin leverage without committing to specifics, keeping multiple governments guessing about whether they’re being warned, recruited, or set up as a public example.
“In the immediate future” signals urgency but also choreography. It tells domestic audiences that the Kremlin is acting, and tells foreign leaders that the next conversation won’t be friendly. “Calling upon the leaders” sounds like a polite invitation; in Russian presidential register, it’s closer to a summons. The subtext is conditional: stop “this kind of activity,” or Russia will reserve the right to escalate - diplomatically, economically, or militarily - while framing any escalation as reluctant self-defense.
It’s rhetoric built for plausible deniability: firm enough to intimidate, vague enough to maneuver, and calibrated to reassert Russia as a security power that still gets to name the threats.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Boris
Add to List


