"We can build new housing while preserving the quality and character of adjacent residential districts and ensuring infill development strengthens the surrounding neighborhood"
About this Quote
It’s the kind of sentence designed to make every side of a housing fight hear what it wants. “We can build” signals optimism and capability, but it’s really a permission slip: development is coming, and the speaker is preemptively framing it as responsible rather than disruptive. Then comes the political tightrope walk: “new housing” is the concession to YIMBY urgency, while “preserving the quality and character” is the coded reassurance to homeowners who treat change as a threat to property values, parking, and social norms.
“Adjacent residential districts” does quiet work here. It implies that the new housing will happen somewhere else - close enough to count, but not so close that it feels like an invasion. And “ensuring infill development strengthens the surrounding neighborhood” smuggles in a moral standard that’s hard to argue with and easy to weaponize. Who decides what “strengthens” means? In practice, that language often becomes a veto point: design review, discretionary approvals, and endless demands for compatibility that can shrink projects, raise costs, or kill them entirely.
The context is California’s chronic housing shortage colliding with local control. Newsom’s brand is big-state problem solving, but he governs in a landscape where cities have long used “neighborhood character” as a velvet rope - a polite phrase that can stand in for exclusion, whether by zoning that bans apartments, or by process that makes building painfully slow. The quote reads like a promise of balance; the subtext is triage: build, but don’t spook the people with the loudest voices at city hall.
“Adjacent residential districts” does quiet work here. It implies that the new housing will happen somewhere else - close enough to count, but not so close that it feels like an invasion. And “ensuring infill development strengthens the surrounding neighborhood” smuggles in a moral standard that’s hard to argue with and easy to weaponize. Who decides what “strengthens” means? In practice, that language often becomes a veto point: design review, discretionary approvals, and endless demands for compatibility that can shrink projects, raise costs, or kill them entirely.
The context is California’s chronic housing shortage colliding with local control. Newsom’s brand is big-state problem solving, but he governs in a landscape where cities have long used “neighborhood character” as a velvet rope - a polite phrase that can stand in for exclusion, whether by zoning that bans apartments, or by process that makes building painfully slow. The quote reads like a promise of balance; the subtext is triage: build, but don’t spook the people with the loudest voices at city hall.
Quote Details
| Topic | Vision & Strategy |
|---|
More Quotes by Gavin
Add to List
