"We can demonstrate, by our own example, how E.U. freedoms, including the freedom of nationals of other E.U. countries to come and work here, has enabled us to expand our economy"
About this Quote
Bruton’s sentence is doing the quietly aggressive work of reframing a culture-war issue as an evidence-based economic boast. The key move is the phrase “by our own example”: he’s not arguing in the abstract about European integration; he’s inviting the listener to look at Ireland’s recent trajectory and treat it as a case study that settles the debate. It’s a politician’s version of “don’t take my word for it, look at the numbers,” designed to sound pragmatic rather than ideological.
The subtext sits inside his careful bundling of “E.U. freedoms” with a politically charged one: “the freedom...to come and work here.” By nesting labor mobility within a broader, almost constitutional-sounding set of “freedoms,” Bruton elevates immigration from a policy choice to a principle. That matters because it preempts the most common counterargument: that opening the labor market is a concession forced by Brussels. His grammar even softens agency; “has enabled us” implies empowerment, not imposition.
Contextually, this reads as a pro-European intervention aimed at a domestic audience tempted by restrictionism or sovereignty talk. It’s also a pitch to business-minded voters: migration isn’t framed as charity or multicultural virtue-signaling but as capacity, the workforce as infrastructure. “Expand our economy” is deliberately broad, leaving room to hear tech growth, construction booms, and export competitiveness without naming any one sector - and without inviting scrutiny of distributional downsides. The intent is not to win a moral argument; it’s to make the opposing position sound like self-sabotage.
The subtext sits inside his careful bundling of “E.U. freedoms” with a politically charged one: “the freedom...to come and work here.” By nesting labor mobility within a broader, almost constitutional-sounding set of “freedoms,” Bruton elevates immigration from a policy choice to a principle. That matters because it preempts the most common counterargument: that opening the labor market is a concession forced by Brussels. His grammar even softens agency; “has enabled us” implies empowerment, not imposition.
Contextually, this reads as a pro-European intervention aimed at a domestic audience tempted by restrictionism or sovereignty talk. It’s also a pitch to business-minded voters: migration isn’t framed as charity or multicultural virtue-signaling but as capacity, the workforce as infrastructure. “Expand our economy” is deliberately broad, leaving room to hear tech growth, construction booms, and export competitiveness without naming any one sector - and without inviting scrutiny of distributional downsides. The intent is not to win a moral argument; it’s to make the opposing position sound like self-sabotage.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by John
Add to List




