"We can not wait until we have enough trained people willing to work at a teacher's salary and under conditions imposed upon teachers in order to improve what happens in the classroom"
About this Quote
Owens is taking aim at a comfortable excuse: the idea that schools will improve once we finally recruit an army of saintly, perfectly trained teachers willing to accept low pay and limited autonomy. The line is a refusal to let “teacher quality” function as a stall tactic. If the job is underpaid and tightly constrained, waiting for ideal candidates is less a strategy than a quiet admission that the system plans to keep those conditions intact.
The phrasing does two things at once. “We can not wait” frames classroom improvement as an urgent public obligation, not a long-term aspiration contingent on labor-market miracles. Then he loads the sentence with the realities that reformers often treat as footnotes: “teacher’s salary” and “conditions imposed upon teachers.” That word imposed is the tell. It signals a power imbalance - policy made over teachers’ heads, accountability regimes and administrative mandates that define the job from the outside, then blame the people inside it when outcomes disappoint.
Contextually, Owens is speaking from the political lane where education debates frequently oscillate between two stories: invest in the workforce versus redesign the system. He’s pushing for action that doesn’t require perfect inputs first - better support, better structures, better resources, and reforms that make teaching a sustainable profession rather than a test of martyrdom. The subtext is almost accusatory: if we keep waiting for underpaid heroes, we’re choosing inertia while pretending to be pragmatic.
The phrasing does two things at once. “We can not wait” frames classroom improvement as an urgent public obligation, not a long-term aspiration contingent on labor-market miracles. Then he loads the sentence with the realities that reformers often treat as footnotes: “teacher’s salary” and “conditions imposed upon teachers.” That word imposed is the tell. It signals a power imbalance - policy made over teachers’ heads, accountability regimes and administrative mandates that define the job from the outside, then blame the people inside it when outcomes disappoint.
Contextually, Owens is speaking from the political lane where education debates frequently oscillate between two stories: invest in the workforce versus redesign the system. He’s pushing for action that doesn’t require perfect inputs first - better support, better structures, better resources, and reforms that make teaching a sustainable profession rather than a test of martyrdom. The subtext is almost accusatory: if we keep waiting for underpaid heroes, we’re choosing inertia while pretending to be pragmatic.
Quote Details
| Topic | Teaching |
|---|
More Quotes by Major
Add to List


