"We can only reason from what is; we can reason on actualities, but not on possibilities"
About this Quote
The intent is tactical. Paine is writing as a revolutionary pamphleteer, not a salon philosopher. He wants arguments that can survive contact with reality, because reality is where legitimacy is either earned or forfeited. The line also functions as a preemptive strike against conservative counterclaims: the warnings that independence might fail, that self-government might collapse, that the “experiment” could go wrong. Paine’s move is to treat those anxieties as speculative indulgence, a luxury belief of people insulated from the “actualities” of colonial life.
There’s a bracing modernity to it. Paine is insisting on an evidence-based politics before that phrase existed, and he’s implying that power loves hypothetical disaster scenarios because they’re impossible to falsify. Anchor yourself in what is: who holds authority, who suffers, who benefits. Once you do, the moral geometry becomes harder to evade.
Quote Details
| Topic | Reason & Logic |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Paine, Thomas. (2026, January 18). We can only reason from what is; we can reason on actualities, but not on possibilities. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-can-only-reason-from-what-is-we-can-reason-on-10471/
Chicago Style
Paine, Thomas. "We can only reason from what is; we can reason on actualities, but not on possibilities." FixQuotes. January 18, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-can-only-reason-from-what-is-we-can-reason-on-10471/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"We can only reason from what is; we can reason on actualities, but not on possibilities." FixQuotes, 18 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-can-only-reason-from-what-is-we-can-reason-on-10471/. Accessed 12 Feb. 2026.












