"We can only write well about our sins because it is too difficult to recall a virtuous act or even whether it was the result of good or evil motives"
About this Quote
Dahlberg, a modernist-era novelist with a taste for moral abrasion, isn’t only talking about ethics; he’s diagnosing literature. Readers trust sin on the page because it feels specific and embodied. Virtue often arrives as propaganda or self-mythology, the kind of thing that collapses into platitude the moment you try to dramatize it. His claim that we can’t even tell “whether it was the result of good or evil motives” reframes goodness as epistemological problem: the self is a bad witness in its own trial.
The subtext is a rebuke to moral posturing. If you can’t reliably account for your best moments, then your public righteousness is suspect. At the same time, he gives artists a backhanded permission slip: write the darkness, not because you’re brave, but because it’s legible. Sin is memorable; virtue is often just sin with better PR.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Dahlberg, Edward. (2026, January 17). We can only write well about our sins because it is too difficult to recall a virtuous act or even whether it was the result of good or evil motives. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-can-only-write-well-about-our-sins-because-it-52470/
Chicago Style
Dahlberg, Edward. "We can only write well about our sins because it is too difficult to recall a virtuous act or even whether it was the result of good or evil motives." FixQuotes. January 17, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-can-only-write-well-about-our-sins-because-it-52470/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"We can only write well about our sins because it is too difficult to recall a virtuous act or even whether it was the result of good or evil motives." FixQuotes, 17 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-can-only-write-well-about-our-sins-because-it-52470/. Accessed 7 Feb. 2026.





