"We can overcome evil with greater good"
About this Quote
It’s the kind of sentence that sounds like a bumper sticker until you remember who’s saying it: a First Lady, speaking from the soft-power wing of an administration built on hard-power choices. “We can overcome evil with greater good” isn’t trying to win an argument so much as steady a national mood. The pronoun “we” is the quiet engine here, drafting the listener into moral consensus while sidestepping the messy question of who defines “evil” in the first place.
Laura Bush’s public role was often to translate geopolitical urgency into domestic virtue: compassion, education, health, women’s rights. In the post-9/11 era especially, the language of “evil” was everywhere, a simplified moral grammar that made fear legible and action feel necessary. Her twist is the addition of “greater good,” a phrase that borrows the emotional clarity of a children’s book while hinting at a longer, calmer timeline than battlefield news cycles. It’s reassurance dressed as resolve.
The subtext is strategic: goodness is framed not as passive innocence but as an escalatory force, “greater” as in stronger, more durable, more legitimate. That matters when a country is asked to see itself as righteous while prosecuting wars, expanding surveillance, and absorbing casualties. In that light, the line reads as a moral alibi and a moral aspiration at once: it invites the public to believe that whatever darkness exists can be answered without becoming dark ourselves. Whether that’s a promise or a plea is the tension that makes it stick.
Laura Bush’s public role was often to translate geopolitical urgency into domestic virtue: compassion, education, health, women’s rights. In the post-9/11 era especially, the language of “evil” was everywhere, a simplified moral grammar that made fear legible and action feel necessary. Her twist is the addition of “greater good,” a phrase that borrows the emotional clarity of a children’s book while hinting at a longer, calmer timeline than battlefield news cycles. It’s reassurance dressed as resolve.
The subtext is strategic: goodness is framed not as passive innocence but as an escalatory force, “greater” as in stronger, more durable, more legitimate. That matters when a country is asked to see itself as righteous while prosecuting wars, expanding surveillance, and absorbing casualties. In that light, the line reads as a moral alibi and a moral aspiration at once: it invites the public to believe that whatever darkness exists can be answered without becoming dark ourselves. Whether that’s a promise or a plea is the tension that makes it stick.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ethics & Morality |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Laura
Add to List










