"We cannot build a viable state with a country that is disintegrating into small pieces"
About this Quote
A state is only as real as the territory and institutions that can hold it together, and Mahmoud Abbas is signaling that Palestine is being hollowed out faster than diplomacy can name it. The line is plainspoken, almost bureaucratic, but that’s the point: it frames fragmentation as an engineering problem with political consequences, not merely a tragedy. “Viable” is doing heavy lifting here. It’s the language of donor conferences, UN briefings, and state-building metrics, smuggling a moral alarm into a technocratic word.
The subtext is a warning aimed in multiple directions. To Israel and the international community: continued settlement expansion, checkpoints, and the patchwork geography of the West Bank make a contiguous, governable polity impossible. To Palestinians: internal division and administrative weakness are also part of the disintegration. Abbas has long bet on recognition and institutions over armed struggle; this sentence is a defense of that bet and an indictment of the conditions undermining it.
Context matters because “small pieces” evokes the lived map: disconnected enclaves, separate legal regimes, and an economy throttled by movement restrictions. It also nods to political geography: Gaza versus the West Bank, rival authorities, competing security forces. Abbas is arguing that sovereignty can’t be conjured from symbolism alone; it requires coherence. The rhetorical move is strategic: by describing disintegration as a concrete, measurable process, he pressures external actors to treat time as an adversary. Every new fragment, he implies, is a vote against the very idea of a future state.
The subtext is a warning aimed in multiple directions. To Israel and the international community: continued settlement expansion, checkpoints, and the patchwork geography of the West Bank make a contiguous, governable polity impossible. To Palestinians: internal division and administrative weakness are also part of the disintegration. Abbas has long bet on recognition and institutions over armed struggle; this sentence is a defense of that bet and an indictment of the conditions undermining it.
Context matters because “small pieces” evokes the lived map: disconnected enclaves, separate legal regimes, and an economy throttled by movement restrictions. It also nods to political geography: Gaza versus the West Bank, rival authorities, competing security forces. Abbas is arguing that sovereignty can’t be conjured from symbolism alone; it requires coherence. The rhetorical move is strategic: by describing disintegration as a concrete, measurable process, he pressures external actors to treat time as an adversary. Every new fragment, he implies, is a vote against the very idea of a future state.
Quote Details
| Topic | Peace |
|---|
More Quotes by Mahmoud
Add to List







