"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded"
About this Quote
Obama is doing something rhetorically slippery here: reassuring an exhausted country that national security can be smarter than endless war, while quietly widening the definition of what counts as “security.” The opening clause sounds like a rebuke of militarism. The pivot - “we’ve got to have” - turns that critique into an institutional sales pitch. He isn’t arguing for less power; he’s arguing for a second, parallel kind of power.
The key phrase is “civilian national security force,” a deliberately technocratic construction that borrows the moral legitimacy of civilian life (teachers, doctors, diplomats) and welds it to the coercive aura of “force.” By pairing it with “just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded,” Obama signals parity with the Pentagon, not a corrective to it. The repetition works like a drumbeat: this is not a boutique State Department revival; it’s an insistence that soft power should be funded and staffed with the seriousness of hard power.
Context matters. Late-2000s America was coming off Iraq and Afghanistan, with a public wary of troop surges but still politically allergic to looking “weak.” Obama’s line threads that needle: national security becomes a whole-of-government enterprise - diplomacy, intelligence, development, cyber, homeland security - without conceding the primacy of security as the organizing principle. Subtext: if the military can’t (or shouldn’t) do everything, the answer is not demilitarization, it’s professionalizing and expanding the civilian apparatus that supports, complements, and sometimes extends American power by other means.
The key phrase is “civilian national security force,” a deliberately technocratic construction that borrows the moral legitimacy of civilian life (teachers, doctors, diplomats) and welds it to the coercive aura of “force.” By pairing it with “just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded,” Obama signals parity with the Pentagon, not a corrective to it. The repetition works like a drumbeat: this is not a boutique State Department revival; it’s an insistence that soft power should be funded and staffed with the seriousness of hard power.
Context matters. Late-2000s America was coming off Iraq and Afghanistan, with a public wary of troop surges but still politically allergic to looking “weak.” Obama’s line threads that needle: national security becomes a whole-of-government enterprise - diplomacy, intelligence, development, cyber, homeland security - without conceding the primacy of security as the organizing principle. Subtext: if the military can’t (or shouldn’t) do everything, the answer is not demilitarization, it’s professionalizing and expanding the civilian apparatus that supports, complements, and sometimes extends American power by other means.
Quote Details
| Topic | Military & Soldier |
|---|---|
| Source | Unverified source: Remarks at the University of Colorado, Colorado Springs (Barack Obama, 2008)
Evidence: Primary-source context: This quote comes from Barack Obama’s campaign remarks titled “A New Era of Service,” delivered July 2, 2008, at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs (Colorado Springs, CO). The commonly-circulated wording matches the relevant portion of the transcript as preserved b... Other candidates (2) What the Hell Happened to America? (Ron Schaeffer, 2012) compilation100.0% ... We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've s... Barack Obama (Barack Obama) compilation98.6% et journal 14 june 2008 we cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security obj... |
More Quotes by Barack
Add to List





