"We cannot forget the little things we take for granted in America that remain the disdain of dictators and terrorists throughout the world"
About this Quote
Lott’s line is built to do two things at once: sanctify the ordinary, and weaponize comparison. By calling out “little things we take for granted,” he avoids the lofty abstractions that can sound like canned patriotism and instead gestures toward daily-life freedoms (speech without fear, routine elections, the right to dissent) that feel almost invisible until they’re threatened. The rhetoric is domestic and intimate: your normal Tuesday becomes a civic miracle.
The second half flips that intimacy into menace. “Disdain of dictators and terrorists” collapses very different actors into one silhouette of evil, a familiar post-Cold War, post-9/11 move that simplifies foreign conflict into a moral contrast: us (casual liberty) versus them (organized hatred). That compression is the point. It turns policy arguments into loyalty tests and makes skepticism feel like forgetfulness, even indulgence.
The intent is less about remembrance in the historical sense than about discipline in the political sense: keep the public emotionally aligned with a security agenda and a nationalist frame by insisting that everyday comfort is precisely what the enemy resents. Subtext: criticism, protest, or questioning state power risks taking those “little things” for granted; vigilance means unity.
Context matters because Lott’s era in national leadership ran through the culture wars and the “war on terror,” when politicians routinely fused patriotism, fear, and gratitude into a single message. The sentence works because it flatters Americans as accidental stewards of freedom while implying that the world is watching with hostility. That’s not nuance; it’s a mobilization tactic.
The second half flips that intimacy into menace. “Disdain of dictators and terrorists” collapses very different actors into one silhouette of evil, a familiar post-Cold War, post-9/11 move that simplifies foreign conflict into a moral contrast: us (casual liberty) versus them (organized hatred). That compression is the point. It turns policy arguments into loyalty tests and makes skepticism feel like forgetfulness, even indulgence.
The intent is less about remembrance in the historical sense than about discipline in the political sense: keep the public emotionally aligned with a security agenda and a nationalist frame by insisting that everyday comfort is precisely what the enemy resents. Subtext: criticism, protest, or questioning state power risks taking those “little things” for granted; vigilance means unity.
Context matters because Lott’s era in national leadership ran through the culture wars and the “war on terror,” when politicians routinely fused patriotism, fear, and gratitude into a single message. The sentence works because it flatters Americans as accidental stewards of freedom while implying that the world is watching with hostility. That’s not nuance; it’s a mobilization tactic.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Trent
Add to List


