"We cannot go on as we are with 2.6 million people on incapacity benefit, 500,000 of them are under 35. Are we really saying there are half a million people in this country under 35 who are simply too ill to work? I don't think that's right"
About this Quote
Cameron builds this like a courtroom cross-examination: stack the numbers, ask a question that feels like common sense, then deliver the verdict. The statistic (2.6 million, half a million under 35) isn’t just information; it’s a framing device. It turns a complex welfare category into a looming crowd, then narrows the spotlight onto the young, a group the public is primed to read as “should be able to work.” The rhetorical question does the real work: it invites the listener to answer “of course not,” making dissent feel like naivete or indulgence.
The subtext is suspicion. “Incapacity benefit” is treated less as a safety net for people with fluctuating or invisible conditions and more as a holding pen for idleness. Cameron’s “too ill to work” is deliberately blunt, collapsing a spectrum of disability and work-limiting illness into an absolute. That simplification is the point: it sets up a binary in which the state is either being taken for a ride or is enabling defeatism.
Context matters. This line lands in the post-financial-crisis austerity mood, when welfare reform was sold as moral repair as much as budget discipline. Young claimants become the political lever: rhetorically useful because they trigger anxieties about dependency, but also because tightening eligibility can be pitched as “help” (activation, reassessment, back-to-work programs) rather than cuts. “I don’t think that’s right” is a careful closing move: it reads as reasonable concern, while signaling a presumption that large numbers equal illegitimacy.
The subtext is suspicion. “Incapacity benefit” is treated less as a safety net for people with fluctuating or invisible conditions and more as a holding pen for idleness. Cameron’s “too ill to work” is deliberately blunt, collapsing a spectrum of disability and work-limiting illness into an absolute. That simplification is the point: it sets up a binary in which the state is either being taken for a ride or is enabling defeatism.
Context matters. This line lands in the post-financial-crisis austerity mood, when welfare reform was sold as moral repair as much as budget discipline. Young claimants become the political lever: rhetorically useful because they trigger anxieties about dependency, but also because tightening eligibility can be pitched as “help” (activation, reassessment, back-to-work programs) rather than cuts. “I don’t think that’s right” is a careful closing move: it reads as reasonable concern, while signaling a presumption that large numbers equal illegitimacy.
Quote Details
| Topic | Justice |
|---|
More Quotes by David
Add to List



