"We cannot have that relationship if we only dictate or threaten and condemn those who disagree"
About this Quote
Diplomacy, Brzezinski is arguing, is not a mood; it is a method. The line reads like a reprimand to the perennial Washington impulse to treat disagreement as defiance and policy as punishment. Coming from a strategist who spent his career thinking in balance-of-power terms, the point isn’t sentimental pluralism. It’s a cold assessment of leverage: relationships are built on inducements, credibility, and room to maneuver, not on the rhetorical sugar high of moral condemnation.
The key word is “relationship,” a term that smuggles intimacy into geopolitics. Brzezinski frames international order less as a courtroom (with villains to prosecute) and more as a network of ongoing dependencies. Dictation and threats can win compliance in the short run, but they also produce a predictable backlash: allies become clients, clients become resentful, and resentful actors start shopping for alternative patrons. Condemnation, meanwhile, is theater that plays well domestically while corroding the very access and influence it pretends to protect.
Contextually, this sits comfortably in the post-Vietnam, Cold War-to-post-Cold War arc where U.S. power remained enormous but increasingly mediated by perception. Brzezinski understood that hegemony isn’t just coercion; it’s management of consent, especially among partners who have their own publics, pride, and strategic options. The subtext is a warning against the comforting fantasy that values-based scolding can substitute for statecraft. If you want cooperation from people who disagree with you, you have to give them a reason - and a face-saving way - to say yes.
The key word is “relationship,” a term that smuggles intimacy into geopolitics. Brzezinski frames international order less as a courtroom (with villains to prosecute) and more as a network of ongoing dependencies. Dictation and threats can win compliance in the short run, but they also produce a predictable backlash: allies become clients, clients become resentful, and resentful actors start shopping for alternative patrons. Condemnation, meanwhile, is theater that plays well domestically while corroding the very access and influence it pretends to protect.
Contextually, this sits comfortably in the post-Vietnam, Cold War-to-post-Cold War arc where U.S. power remained enormous but increasingly mediated by perception. Brzezinski understood that hegemony isn’t just coercion; it’s management of consent, especially among partners who have their own publics, pride, and strategic options. The subtext is a warning against the comforting fantasy that values-based scolding can substitute for statecraft. If you want cooperation from people who disagree with you, you have to give them a reason - and a face-saving way - to say yes.
Quote Details
| Topic | Respect |
|---|
More Quotes by Zbigniew
Add to List








