"We cannot ignore the disparity in resources that continue to plague many of our school systems, especially those serving predominantly inner-city minority and impoverished children"
About this Quote
The power move here is that Watson frames inequality as a choice, not a tragic accident. “We cannot ignore” doesn’t just urge attention; it implies complicity. If the disparity “continue[s],” then someone has been watching it happen long enough for it to become routine. The line quietly indicts a political culture that treats school funding gaps like weather: unfortunate, persistent, nobody’s fault.
Her diction does careful political work. “Disparity in resources” is technocratic enough to survive a committee hearing, but “plague” yanks it back into moral language. A plague spreads, lingers, and signals institutional failure; it also demands intervention, not sympathy. Then she narrows the lens to “predominantly inner-city minority and impoverished children,” stacking descriptors that map the intersection of race, geography, and class without saying the more explosive words outright: segregation, redlining, disinvestment. The phrasing leaves room for broad coalition politics while still making it clear who is paying the price.
Context matters: Watson came up through California politics and served in Congress during decades when “accountability” reforms and standardized testing surged, often without equal attention to inputs like staffing, facilities, counselors, and safe buildings. Her intent reads as a rebuttal to the era’s favorite dodge: blaming outcomes on students, families, or “culture.” The subtext is blunt: you can’t demand equal performance from schools you’ve built to be unequal.
Her diction does careful political work. “Disparity in resources” is technocratic enough to survive a committee hearing, but “plague” yanks it back into moral language. A plague spreads, lingers, and signals institutional failure; it also demands intervention, not sympathy. Then she narrows the lens to “predominantly inner-city minority and impoverished children,” stacking descriptors that map the intersection of race, geography, and class without saying the more explosive words outright: segregation, redlining, disinvestment. The phrasing leaves room for broad coalition politics while still making it clear who is paying the price.
Context matters: Watson came up through California politics and served in Congress during decades when “accountability” reforms and standardized testing surged, often without equal attention to inputs like staffing, facilities, counselors, and safe buildings. Her intent reads as a rebuttal to the era’s favorite dodge: blaming outcomes on students, families, or “culture.” The subtext is blunt: you can’t demand equal performance from schools you’ve built to be unequal.
Quote Details
| Topic | Equality |
|---|
More Quotes by Diane
Add to List
