"We could receive a storm surge of three to five feet"
About this Quote
The context, of course, is Hurricane Katrina and the brutal mismatch between forecast language and lived reality in New Orleans. In a city engineered around vulnerable levees and below-sea-level neighborhoods, "three to five feet" isn't a footnote; it's water in living rooms, cars floating, hospitals failing, evacuation routes collapsing. Nagin's conditional phrasing - "could receive" - functions as political insulation. It acknowledges risk without owning the consequences of unpreparedness. The sentence is less a warning than a hedge.
Subtext hangs in what isn't said: who, exactly, can leave, and who will be left to measure the surge with their bodies. Technical language can be a kind of moral anesthesia, especially when the people most exposed are also the people with the least mobility, money, or trust in institutions that have failed them before. Nagin's line captures a recurring American crisis pattern: leaders narrate disaster in neutral metrics while the public experiences it as abandonment.
Quote Details
| Topic | Ocean & Sea |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Nagin, Ray. (2026, January 15). We could receive a storm surge of three to five feet. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-could-receive-a-storm-surge-of-three-to-five-161652/
Chicago Style
Nagin, Ray. "We could receive a storm surge of three to five feet." FixQuotes. January 15, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-could-receive-a-storm-surge-of-three-to-five-161652/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"We could receive a storm surge of three to five feet." FixQuotes, 15 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-could-receive-a-storm-surge-of-three-to-five-161652/. Accessed 21 Feb. 2026.




