"We do not judge the people we love"
About this Quote
A suspiciously comforting line from a thinker who rarely offered comfort. Sartre, the philosopher of bad faith and self-deception, isn’t tossing out a Hallmark defense of unconditional love; he’s exposing a loophole in how we maintain intimacy. “We do not judge” reads less like moral advice than a description of a tactic: love is the one relationship where we agree to suspend the courtroom, because judgment would force a verdict, and a verdict would force action. If you truly judged the person you love, you might have to leave, confront, demand change, or admit you’ve misread them. Love often survives by refusing that clarity.
The subtext is existentialist and slightly bleak: human beings are free, slippery, and always inventing themselves, which makes them hard to “know” in any fixed way. Judgment tries to pin someone down, to turn a living person into an object with a stable essence: good, bad, worthy, disappointing. Sartre spent his career warning against that impulse. To judge is to freeze; to love, at least in its generous form, is to keep the other’s freedom intact, even when it’s inconvenient.
The context matters: mid-century Europe, moral reckonings after war, and Sartre’s own scandalous visibility as a public intellectual. In that world, judgment was everywhere - political, personal, ideological. The line doubles as a critique of righteous certainty. It also quietly implicates the lover: refusing to judge can be compassion, or it can be complicity. Sartre leaves that tension intact, because it’s the only honest way to describe how love actually works.
The subtext is existentialist and slightly bleak: human beings are free, slippery, and always inventing themselves, which makes them hard to “know” in any fixed way. Judgment tries to pin someone down, to turn a living person into an object with a stable essence: good, bad, worthy, disappointing. Sartre spent his career warning against that impulse. To judge is to freeze; to love, at least in its generous form, is to keep the other’s freedom intact, even when it’s inconvenient.
The context matters: mid-century Europe, moral reckonings after war, and Sartre’s own scandalous visibility as a public intellectual. In that world, judgment was everywhere - political, personal, ideological. The line doubles as a critique of righteous certainty. It also quietly implicates the lover: refusing to judge can be compassion, or it can be complicity. Sartre leaves that tension intact, because it’s the only honest way to describe how love actually works.
Quote Details
| Topic | Love |
|---|
More Quotes by Jean-Paul
Add to List
