"We don't need to eat anyone who would run, swim, or fly away if he could"
About this Quote
The specific intent is to puncture the cultural story that humans eat animals because its natural or necessary. His subtext is cruder and sharper: the only reason we get away with eating animals is that most of them cannot successfully escape us. That implication makes the whole practice feel less like tradition and more like dominance. Even the pronoun choice, he, is doing work; it refuses the distancing language of livestock and turns the animal into a character you can picture.
Context matters because Cromwell is speaking from within a media ecosystem where moral arguments are often dismissed as preachy. So he leans on wit, not righteousness. The quote invites a laugh, then recruits that laugh into discomfort. If we agree we should not eat the ones that could get away, we have to explain why the ones who cannot are fair game. The trap is elegant: either admit the ethics are arbitrary, or reconsider the menu.
Quote Details
| Topic | Kindness |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
| Cite | Cite this Quote |
Citation Formats
APA Style (7th ed.)
Cromwell, James. (2026, January 16). We don't need to eat anyone who would run, swim, or fly away if he could. FixQuotes. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-dont-need-to-eat-anyone-who-would-run-swim-or-125700/
Chicago Style
Cromwell, James. "We don't need to eat anyone who would run, swim, or fly away if he could." FixQuotes. January 16, 2026. https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-dont-need-to-eat-anyone-who-would-run-swim-or-125700/.
MLA Style (9th ed.)
"We don't need to eat anyone who would run, swim, or fly away if he could." FixQuotes, 16 Jan. 2026, https://fixquotes.com/quotes/we-dont-need-to-eat-anyone-who-would-run-swim-or-125700/. Accessed 4 Feb. 2026.






