"We don't start a job that we can't finish... that's the American way"
About this Quote
The swagger in "We don't start a job that we can't finish... that's the American way" is doing two jobs at once: it frames policy as character, and it turns doubt into disloyalty. The line borrows the cadence of locker-room motivation and frontier myth, packaging state violence and geopolitical risk as a simple ethic of follow-through. It sounds like grit. It functions like a trap.
Wolfowitz, best known as a chief architect of the Iraq War, isn’t offering a neutral description of American behavior; he’s offering a moral alibi. The ellipsis is a little rhetorical shrug that smooths over the inconvenient middle: what counts as "finish", who defines it, and what happens when the premise of the job is wrong. By casting intervention as a "job", the quote launders a choice into an obligation. Once you’re in, you must stay, because leaving would violate the national brand.
The subtext is aimed squarely at domestic audiences: patience is patriotism, and criticism is weakness. It’s a move that shifts the conversation away from evidence (Was the mission justified? Is it working?) toward identity (Are we the kind of people who quit?). In the early-2000s context, that’s not accidental. It echoes a broader post-9/11 political style that fused resolve with virtue and treated ambiguity as moral failure.
What makes the line effective is also what makes it dangerous: it recruits a comforting story of American competence to cover a far messier reality, where "finishing" can mean endless escalation, and the costs are paid far from the podium.
Wolfowitz, best known as a chief architect of the Iraq War, isn’t offering a neutral description of American behavior; he’s offering a moral alibi. The ellipsis is a little rhetorical shrug that smooths over the inconvenient middle: what counts as "finish", who defines it, and what happens when the premise of the job is wrong. By casting intervention as a "job", the quote launders a choice into an obligation. Once you’re in, you must stay, because leaving would violate the national brand.
The subtext is aimed squarely at domestic audiences: patience is patriotism, and criticism is weakness. It’s a move that shifts the conversation away from evidence (Was the mission justified? Is it working?) toward identity (Are we the kind of people who quit?). In the early-2000s context, that’s not accidental. It echoes a broader post-9/11 political style that fused resolve with virtue and treated ambiguity as moral failure.
What makes the line effective is also what makes it dangerous: it recruits a comforting story of American competence to cover a far messier reality, where "finishing" can mean endless escalation, and the costs are paid far from the podium.
Quote Details
| Topic | Perseverance |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by Paul
Add to List





