"We had to address information technology in the ways we had not before and give the agents the tools that they need to do their job more efficiently and more expeditiously"
About this Quote
Bureaucracy rarely admits it has fallen behind, so Mueller’s phrasing is doing quiet damage control. “We had to address information technology” frames modernization not as an ambition but as an inevitability forced by events. It’s the language of an institution that has learned, painfully, that casework can’t outrun email, metadata, and networked threats with paper files and legacy systems.
The repetition and padding - “in the ways we had not before,” “more efficiently and more expeditiously” - is classic public-sector risk management. Mueller is promising change while avoiding specifics that could invite scrutiny: What systems failed? Who resisted? How much will this cost? The sentence keeps its hands clean. Even the subject is collective (“we”), diffusing responsibility across the agency rather than pinning it to leadership decisions or past neglect.
“Give the agents the tools” is the crucial subtext. It casts frontline staff as professionals hamstrung by outdated infrastructure, a politically safe narrative that respects the rank-and-file while justifying budget, procurement, and organizational overhaul. It also sidesteps the other side of “tools”: surveillance capacity. Upgrading IT in a federal law-enforcement context isn’t just about speed; it’s about reach, integration, and data visibility.
Contextually, this fits the post-9/11 era of institutional reform, when intelligence failures were publicly dissected and “information sharing” became both mantra and mandate. Mueller’s intent is to signal competence and modernization without provoking the civil-liberties alarms that a more candid description of expanded technical capability might trigger.
The repetition and padding - “in the ways we had not before,” “more efficiently and more expeditiously” - is classic public-sector risk management. Mueller is promising change while avoiding specifics that could invite scrutiny: What systems failed? Who resisted? How much will this cost? The sentence keeps its hands clean. Even the subject is collective (“we”), diffusing responsibility across the agency rather than pinning it to leadership decisions or past neglect.
“Give the agents the tools” is the crucial subtext. It casts frontline staff as professionals hamstrung by outdated infrastructure, a politically safe narrative that respects the rank-and-file while justifying budget, procurement, and organizational overhaul. It also sidesteps the other side of “tools”: surveillance capacity. Upgrading IT in a federal law-enforcement context isn’t just about speed; it’s about reach, integration, and data visibility.
Contextually, this fits the post-9/11 era of institutional reform, when intelligence failures were publicly dissected and “information sharing” became both mantra and mandate. Mueller’s intent is to signal competence and modernization without provoking the civil-liberties alarms that a more candid description of expanded technical capability might trigger.
Quote Details
| Topic | Technology |
|---|
More Quotes by Robert
Add to List
