"We have a system that increasingly taxes work and subsidizes nonwork"
About this Quote
Friedman’s line lands like a tidy economic equation that doubles as a moral accusation. “Taxes work” is more than a budgetary observation; it frames labor as the virtuous baseline and casts policy as an upside-down reward system. The genius is in the verbs. “Taxes” doesn’t just mean funds government - it punishes. “Subsidizes” doesn’t just mean provides a safety net - it props up a choice Friedman wants you to see as avoidable. By the time you reach “nonwork,” the sentence has already nudged you toward indignation: the state is allegedly taking from strivers to bankroll idleness.
The intent is strategic: compress a sprawling critique of welfare and progressive taxation into a simple, repeatable grievance. It’s built for political reuse because it turns complicated trade-offs (insurance against risk, bargaining power, disability, caregiving, recessions) into a single, legible story about incentives. In Friedman’s worldview, behavior follows price signals; if you lower the payoff to working and raise the payoff to not working, you shouldn’t be surprised when work declines. The subtext is that poverty policy is less about misfortune than misdesign.
Context matters. Friedman was a leading champion of market liberalism in the postwar era, arguing against expansive welfare states and for cleaner, less distortionary mechanisms (he even proposed a negative income tax rather than the patchwork of programs). The line reflects a late-20th-century backlash to means-tested benefits, where “welfare traps” and high effective marginal tax rates could make earning more feel futile. It’s persuasive because it names a real policy failure - then weaponizes it into a broader suspicion of redistribution itself.
The intent is strategic: compress a sprawling critique of welfare and progressive taxation into a simple, repeatable grievance. It’s built for political reuse because it turns complicated trade-offs (insurance against risk, bargaining power, disability, caregiving, recessions) into a single, legible story about incentives. In Friedman’s worldview, behavior follows price signals; if you lower the payoff to working and raise the payoff to not working, you shouldn’t be surprised when work declines. The subtext is that poverty policy is less about misfortune than misdesign.
Context matters. Friedman was a leading champion of market liberalism in the postwar era, arguing against expansive welfare states and for cleaner, less distortionary mechanisms (he even proposed a negative income tax rather than the patchwork of programs). The line reflects a late-20th-century backlash to means-tested benefits, where “welfare traps” and high effective marginal tax rates could make earning more feel futile. It’s persuasive because it names a real policy failure - then weaponizes it into a broader suspicion of redistribution itself.
Quote Details
| Topic | Work |
|---|
More Quotes by Milton
Add to List
