"We have a very active testing community which people don't often think about when you have open source"
About this Quote
Open source loves to market itself as a frictionless meritocracy: code appears, bugs vanish, progress happens. Mitchell Baker’s line punctures that myth with a lawyer’s instinct for the unglamorous infrastructure that makes big promises enforceable. “A very active testing community” is the quiet workforce behind the romance of volunteer coders and heroic maintainers. It’s also a reminder that “open” doesn’t automatically mean “reliable.” Reliability is a social product, not a license.
The phrasing “people don’t often think about” does a lot of work. Baker isn’t merely praising testers; she’s calling out a cultural blind spot. In many open-source ecosystems, contributors who write new features get status, while testers and QA folks do the less visible labor of breaking things, documenting failures, and insisting on standards. That labor reads as negativity until it saves a release.
Context matters: Baker, long associated with Mozilla and the governance side of open-source, is speaking from the layer where community norms become policy and where “trust” has to be operationalized. Testing is how a project converts diffuse participation into something institutions can bet on. It’s also how open-source counters its own worst stereotype: that anyone can change anything, so nothing is stable.
Underneath the compliment is a subtle argument about power. Open source isn’t just code you can inspect; it’s a civic structure. A testing community is the project’s immune system, and Baker is insisting we notice the biology, not just the brand.
The phrasing “people don’t often think about” does a lot of work. Baker isn’t merely praising testers; she’s calling out a cultural blind spot. In many open-source ecosystems, contributors who write new features get status, while testers and QA folks do the less visible labor of breaking things, documenting failures, and insisting on standards. That labor reads as negativity until it saves a release.
Context matters: Baker, long associated with Mozilla and the governance side of open-source, is speaking from the layer where community norms become policy and where “trust” has to be operationalized. Testing is how a project converts diffuse participation into something institutions can bet on. It’s also how open-source counters its own worst stereotype: that anyone can change anything, so nothing is stable.
Underneath the compliment is a subtle argument about power. Open source isn’t just code you can inspect; it’s a civic structure. A testing community is the project’s immune system, and Baker is insisting we notice the biology, not just the brand.
Quote Details
| Topic | Coding & Programming |
|---|
More Quotes by Mitchell
Add to List
