"We have for the past year and undoubtedly will be for the next year, dealing with an electorate that is more alienated and more cynical than at any point in modern time"
About this Quote
Teeter’s line isn’t a lament; it’s a field report from the front end of modern political marketing. By framing “the past year” and “the next year,” he turns alienation into a climate condition - not a crisis to resolve but an atmosphere to navigate. The electorate isn’t merely dissatisfied; it’s “more alienated and more cynical than at any point in modern time,” a maximalist claim that functions less as measured diagnosis than as permission structure. If voters are uniquely unreachable, then extraordinary tactics feel justified: sharper negative ads, more micro-targeting, more appeals to grievance, fewer attempts at persuasion across lines.
The subtext is strategic and slightly self-exculpatory. Cynicism becomes the voter’s defect rather than politics’ output, shifting responsibility away from institutions, parties, and consultants who helped make campaigns feel transactional. “Dealing with” is telling: the electorate is positioned as an object to manage, not a public to serve. That managerial posture hints at the consultant-era assumption that democracy is an optimization problem - how to win under bad conditions - rather than a project of rebuilding trust.
Contextually, the quote lands squarely in the late-20th-century arc of declining confidence in government, post-Watergate skepticism, and the rise of permanent campaigning. It captures a pivot point where political actors stop pretending that public faith is a shared asset and start treating its absence as the baseline. Teeter isn’t just describing cynicism; he’s normalizing it, preparing everyone in the room to stop chasing legitimacy and start chasing turnout.
The subtext is strategic and slightly self-exculpatory. Cynicism becomes the voter’s defect rather than politics’ output, shifting responsibility away from institutions, parties, and consultants who helped make campaigns feel transactional. “Dealing with” is telling: the electorate is positioned as an object to manage, not a public to serve. That managerial posture hints at the consultant-era assumption that democracy is an optimization problem - how to win under bad conditions - rather than a project of rebuilding trust.
Contextually, the quote lands squarely in the late-20th-century arc of declining confidence in government, post-Watergate skepticism, and the rise of permanent campaigning. It captures a pivot point where political actors stop pretending that public faith is a shared asset and start treating its absence as the baseline. Teeter isn’t just describing cynicism; he’s normalizing it, preparing everyone in the room to stop chasing legitimacy and start chasing turnout.
Quote Details
| Topic | Freedom |
|---|
More Quotes by Robert
Add to List


