"We have gasoline at $2 a gallon. If that doesn't drive demand, I don't know what will"
About this Quote
Gas at $2 a gallon is doing the rhetorical work of a stimulus check you can pump. Granholm’s line leans on a blunt, almost market-fundamentalist premise: cheaper fuel equals more driving, more spending, more “normal life.” The sentence is constructed like a dare to reality. “If that doesn’t drive demand” is a wink of technocrat confidence, quickly followed by the hedge that gives it political cover: “I don’t know what will.” It’s an economist’s shrug dressed up as folksy common sense.
The intent is to reframe a volatile, emotionally loaded metric into a sign of economic health. For voters, gasoline is a daily referendum on leadership; for policymakers, it’s a proxy for inflation, mobility, and consumer confidence. By celebrating $2 gas, she signals relief and momentum, especially after periods when high prices dominated headlines and cable-news outrage. The subtext is more complicated: the administration wants growth, but it also wants an energy transition. Cheering low gas prices can read as applause for the very fossil-fuel dependence clean-energy policy is supposed to unwind.
There’s also a quiet admission of limits. Demand is being treated as something you can coax with price alone, even as broader factors (pandemic habits, wage stagnation, supply-chain shocks, geopolitics) shape how people actually spend. The line works because it’s legible and quotable, but its simplicity is the tell: it’s less an analysis than a message discipline test, betting that pocketbook psychology beats policy nuance every time.
The intent is to reframe a volatile, emotionally loaded metric into a sign of economic health. For voters, gasoline is a daily referendum on leadership; for policymakers, it’s a proxy for inflation, mobility, and consumer confidence. By celebrating $2 gas, she signals relief and momentum, especially after periods when high prices dominated headlines and cable-news outrage. The subtext is more complicated: the administration wants growth, but it also wants an energy transition. Cheering low gas prices can read as applause for the very fossil-fuel dependence clean-energy policy is supposed to unwind.
There’s also a quiet admission of limits. Demand is being treated as something you can coax with price alone, even as broader factors (pandemic habits, wage stagnation, supply-chain shocks, geopolitics) shape how people actually spend. The line works because it’s legible and quotable, but its simplicity is the tell: it’s less an analysis than a message discipline test, betting that pocketbook psychology beats policy nuance every time.
Quote Details
| Topic | Money |
|---|
More Quotes by Jennifer
Add to List

