"We have global interests, potential threats from elsewhere, North Korea, Iran, Taiwan Straits and the like. We must be prepared for any future threat. That is why it is important that this be a transition year, 2006"
About this Quote
Skelton’s sentence reads like budget politics dressed up as geopolitics: a brisk inventory of dangers, then the pivot to an administrative ask. The list is the tell. “North Korea, Iran, Taiwan Straits and the like” isn’t a strategic argument so much as a strategic mood board, a curated set of anxieties meant to feel both current and inexhaustible. By ending with “and the like,” he turns contingency into a permanent condition: threats are not just real, they are iterable.
The key phrase is “transition year, 2006.” That’s insider language with outsized implications. A “transition” isn’t a retreat; it’s a bridge between legacy force structure (post-9/11, Iraq and Afghanistan-era readiness demands) and whatever the Pentagon wants to buy next (networked warfare, missile defense, rapid deployment, modernization after years of operational wear). Skelton, a longtime House Armed Services heavyweight, is signaling to colleagues and constituents that defense policy should not be judged by the war of the moment alone. He’s also giving political cover: if spending rises, it’s prudence; if programs shift, it’s adaptation; if oversight tightens, it’s responsible management during a handoff.
Context matters: mid-2000s Washington was balancing two wars with a growing preoccupation about peer competition in Asia and nuclear brinkmanship elsewhere. The subtext is that preparedness is a narrative that never expires, and “global interests” is the moral permission slip that keeps the machinery funded, flexible, and forward-deployed.
The key phrase is “transition year, 2006.” That’s insider language with outsized implications. A “transition” isn’t a retreat; it’s a bridge between legacy force structure (post-9/11, Iraq and Afghanistan-era readiness demands) and whatever the Pentagon wants to buy next (networked warfare, missile defense, rapid deployment, modernization after years of operational wear). Skelton, a longtime House Armed Services heavyweight, is signaling to colleagues and constituents that defense policy should not be judged by the war of the moment alone. He’s also giving political cover: if spending rises, it’s prudence; if programs shift, it’s adaptation; if oversight tightens, it’s responsible management during a handoff.
Context matters: mid-2000s Washington was balancing two wars with a growing preoccupation about peer competition in Asia and nuclear brinkmanship elsewhere. The subtext is that preparedness is a narrative that never expires, and “global interests” is the moral permission slip that keeps the machinery funded, flexible, and forward-deployed.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|
More Quotes by Ike
Add to List
