"We have got thousands of nuclear weapons in order to achieve deterrence"
About this Quote
The line is doing the most politician thing imaginable: shrinking an apocalyptic arsenal into a neat bureaucratic purpose statement. “Thousands of nuclear weapons” is a grotesquely oversized number, but the phrasing refuses to linger on that grotesquerie. It pivots immediately to “in order to achieve deterrence,” the soothing policy keyword that turns mass destruction into a management strategy. The rhetorical move is anesthetic: acknowledge the scale just long enough to signal seriousness, then wrap it in a doctrine that sounds like stability.
The intent is defensive in the political sense, not the military one. Spratt isn’t celebrating nukes; he’s pre-empting critique. By framing the stockpile as instrumental (“in order to”), he invites the listener to judge it by outcomes rather than ethics. The subtext is that quantity is not excess but insurance, that deterrence is a measurable condition you can buy more of. It’s also a tacit admission of fear: deterrence is the language you use when you’re describing weapons you hope never to use, while quietly conceding you don’t trust anyone enough to stop preparing.
Context matters because “thousands” instantly evokes Cold War overhang and the post-Cold War hangover: arsenals maintained not just by strategy but by inertia, alliance politics, and domestic industries that thrive on permanence. The quote lives in the tension between public revulsion and elite normalization. It works because it offers a moral alibi without sounding moralistic, converting existential risk into a tidy rationale voters are expected to accept as the cost of living under nuclear peace.
The intent is defensive in the political sense, not the military one. Spratt isn’t celebrating nukes; he’s pre-empting critique. By framing the stockpile as instrumental (“in order to”), he invites the listener to judge it by outcomes rather than ethics. The subtext is that quantity is not excess but insurance, that deterrence is a measurable condition you can buy more of. It’s also a tacit admission of fear: deterrence is the language you use when you’re describing weapons you hope never to use, while quietly conceding you don’t trust anyone enough to stop preparing.
Context matters because “thousands” instantly evokes Cold War overhang and the post-Cold War hangover: arsenals maintained not just by strategy but by inertia, alliance politics, and domestic industries that thrive on permanence. The quote lives in the tension between public revulsion and elite normalization. It works because it offers a moral alibi without sounding moralistic, converting existential risk into a tidy rationale voters are expected to accept as the cost of living under nuclear peace.
Quote Details
| Topic | War |
|---|---|
| Source | Help us find the source |
More Quotes by John
Add to List

